Wait, so we know what the demands of the government are (more than one team based in the stadium) but we are still surprised when only central grounds get funding?
Lets count: SFS - Tahs, SydFC, Rooster
WSS - Parra, wanderers, bunch of smaller comitments
ANZ - Every major rectangular game, Souths, Dogs.
AAMI - Storm, Rebels, 2 Soccer teams
MCG - 5 VFL teams
Etihad - 5 VFL teams
So basically, EVERY major redevelopment in the past 50 years has been exclusively for stadiums with multiple teams. Yet Sydney NRL clubs still think they can expect funding for a suburban shack that only they play out of.....
That is obvious.Never suggested otherwise.But Melbourne had to wait quite some time at the old Olympic Park, whereas the AFL teams in the North got more than lucky stadium wise.
Then perhaps it goes against Govt money spent at the GC stadium for the Titans for one team.
.I've always stated there has been incompetence and waste by clubs ,not to have decent infrastructure .
Sydney is not Melbourne for a start, nor Brisbane.The geography for a start and spread of the city is far greater than Melbourne.Their transport services to Melbourne MCG/Etihad/AAMI
If you had a train service express that went direct from Penrith to City/Allianz /ANZ.
A train service from Manly and Cronulla connected to these close at hand railway/stadiums,then we wouldn't be arguing.If Manly was at North Sydney a different story.
Today Richard Hinds an AFL journo noted, if the AFL hadn't put in $10m to stuff up the planned rectangular reconfigurations for ANZ,who knows we would not have needed extra money now.
I am also not that dumb to admit now the money is being spent on ANZ/Allianz,that outlying clubs will have to organise their own financing.
But I repeat comparing Melbourne with Sydney is not the same.