Meh, if he succeeded to get out, would have been play on. Depends on the interpretationIs “intention to get out” after accidentally grounding even a real thing?
Can’t be grounded if he try’s to get up and run again
No offside in goal?
Doesn’t matter, if a hand is on the ball in goal, there is no way to prove he hasn’t grounded the ball.Went up as a try.
I thought if you ground the ball in your own in goal, you didn't need a hand on you to cause a drop out?
For all gamesHodgson should've been off the field for a HIA test.
Do we need independent doctors in finals footy?
Clubs wont care if they cop a 20k fine given the severity of the game and the value of a player like Hodgson... as just displayed.
If it comes at the expense of souffs, easts and Melbourne then I'll allow itCanberra confirmed as the Souths of 2019. He grounded it in goal, end of section. NRL making it up as they fo ffs.
It wasn't grounded, if he'd made it out of the ingoal without dropping it would have been play on
Exactly. Independent docs and Someone in bunker should get the message out that player needs a testHodgson should've been off the field for a HIA test.
Do we need independent doctors in finals footy?
Clubs wont care if they cop a 20k fine given the severity of the game and the value of a player like Hodgson... as just displayed.
Aren’t the doctors independent now?Hodgson should've been off the field for a HIA test.
Do we need independent doctors in finals footy?
Clubs wont care if they cop a 20k fine given the severity of the game and the value of a player like Hodgson... as just displayed.
I'm not certain if it's only the defensive teamCheers, thought that applied to the defensive team only
Preeettty much. Which is why he got up and continued to try and get out of the in-goal...