I was always under the assumption that the arm has to touch the ground for it to be considered a complete tackle. Doesn’t matter if the ball does or doesn’t.The ball did though. I’ll have to check the rules on that one.
Elliot was so surprised he poked his head through he almost stopped. Pin your ears back son, back yourself.
I was always under the assumption that the arm has to touch the ground for it to be considered a complete tackle. Doesn’t matter if the ball does or doesn’t.
Since there was no forward momentum it is no try. Clear as dayFrom the NRL Laws and interpretations
Double Movement - A try will be awarded if: ‘a tackled player’s momentum carries him into the opponents’ in-goal where he grounds the ball even if the ball has first touched the ground in the field of play
From the NRL Laws and interpretations
Double Movement - A try will be awarded if: ‘a tackled player’s momentum carries him into the opponents’ in-goal where he grounds the ball even if the ball has first touched the ground in the field of play
I was always under the assumption that the arm has to touch the ground for it to be considered a complete tackle. Doesn’t matter if the ball does or doesn’t.
2. A player in possession is tackled:
a) when he is held by one or more opposing players and the ball or the hand or arm holding the ball comes into contact with the ground.
When an attacking player is tackled within easy reach of the goal line he should be penalised if he makes a second movement to place the ball over, or on, the line for a try.
they know what they're doingToo many times Watson comes up with a play to remind you why Robinson let him go without much of a fight.
Yep, tend to agree. There was no momentum involved.Since there was no forward momentum it is no try. Clear as day