Apologies for the two posts. There's a paragraph I can't seem to upload due to an internal server error. This is part of the rest.
I think an interesting way to think about it is this: Lomax has the skills that we would like to see in all centres, but the role for centres has changed and much of what is needed from the position is what Lomax is still learning. Aitken was lauded for his play early and I don’t see why that shouldn’t be an aim to be repeated. Lomax should still get his shot to work into that spot over the season.
There’s little doubt Lomax is the better prospect, that’s not really to the point, and if we were talking about rep level wingers, we would need to make a decision. That’s not what we are looking at.
The other point I made previously is that I would like to see how Aitken would do as a left centre. There have been a few people saying he’d be better off there and I think it should happen in the trial.
Oh and Blayke Brailey and Sean Mullany have outplayed Robson on occasion. Dangerous to just regurgitate what is hot at the moment.
Aitken has played 80 NRL games .. he is no rookie anymore and three seasons of his 4 has played 22 games or more .. That is not quite a full season but near enough.
He burst onto the scene with strength and vigor in his running but obvious areas of weakness - the prime two areas being ability to set up his wing man and decision making in defence. Now Coops never really had the ball playing but his decision making was spot on .. You would have hoped that in 80 games of NRL these deficiencies would have been addressed but whilst there is minimal improvement in them they remain problems in his game. 80 games is more than enough to make a decision on. We are certainly well down the Mitch Rein path with him. For all the talk of Aitken and origin, every time Freddy talks about him he talks about these issues and Nene destroyed him with a single tweet.
Now left centre may be an option but i fail to see how this will address the two holes in his game.
Lomax has played 3 games (4 if you include his 5 minute stint) ... That is nothing in comparision to 80. There are centres in the past 15 years though who have either debuted straight at centre or served a very short apprentiship on the wing and been effective. Jamie Lyon debuted as a centre and played in the grand final qualifier, Gas played centre in his 3rd game, then a couple more on the wing before centre again. More recently Croker played 1 game on wing before every other at centre. Lomax is not the finished product by any stretch .. But if the club is willing to give 80 to aitken flaws and all then it is not a stretch to so the same with a better prospect. His defensive decision making and ball playing are already superiour to Aitkens - he obviously doenst have the running game though.
The question to pose is this: Why after 80 games and no seemingly apparent improvement in the areas of weakness is Aitken a must have in the team? What is wrong with making a brutal decision that improves the team? It took how many seasons of Rein before the club woke up to his weaknesses?