The bigger issue isn’t that Gutho didn’t get a point in round 20, but that Wighton somehow got 3 in round 19 despite 4 errors and a sin binning. Brandy was the judge at that game. Would have laughed even harder if that call cost his boy Cleary the win, unfortunately it cost Gutho.
Didn't Thurston have a high error rate too in general? Errors for a half aren't necessarily killers if they create more chances than not. Part of being a half is to take risks and they will not all come off.
He won his team games this year, as did Gutho, as did Cleary and as did Shaun Johnson (but he got injured but he was up there with them until he was injured).
That's like people arguing that Gutho shouldn't have got points in R20 because he only ran 77 metres. Now i know he didn't get a point but there has been a big conversations on twitter that he had 2 try assists and the try saving tackle and should have received a point and then the counter that he only had 77 metres, so stats clearly aren't everything to everyone. I can't comment on the Wighton R19 performance specifically because i can't remember if he had the biggest impact, i watched the game game don't remember specifics.
As strider mentioned, even our own supporters didn't think he deserved points so it isn't a problem that Kimmorley thought the same, and i thought Brooks was dangerous and certainly created plenty for them and was a reason they were in the match.
It is easy to pile on a player like Brooks and say he doesn't deserve any praise (just like Moses) because they aren't at their best but what people forget is that when these players are at their best they can play like the elite players and the difference between them and the elite is simply consistency!