If I had a buck fort every time a media pundit states something that sounds remotely half intelligent whether right or wrong, that then is repeated by every other f**ker on every other show or interview as if it was their thought, I'd be as rich as Donald Trump.
When they start of by say "well I think..." you know they haven't had an original thought in years and are about to spew out the bleeding obvious to everyone again as if it is a unique idea/thought from only them or they are simply just regurgitating what has been doing the rounds in the media all week.
Love them or hate them but on TV at least, Ennis, Alexander, Cronk, Sterlo, Gould, Fitler Slater and both Johns are about the only ones that really give any insight and original perspectives on the game. I may have forgotten one or two, but they are about it.
Do most of these guys have agendas and biases? Of course they do, but after you watch them long enough, you can annoyingly filter out the noise and only take on the quality of their analysis IF it is there.
The problem is most of the time their bias is so painful that I'm yelling at the TV to much to actually hear their crap in the first place.