What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2022 R6 Sun - Sydney 22-14 Warriors @ SCG

Round 6: Sydney v Warriors

  • Sydney Roosters

    Votes: 6 66.7%
  • Warriors

    Votes: 3 33.3%
  • Draw after Golden Point

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9
  • Poll closed .

Warriors Fever

Juniors
Messages
1,752
Happily surprised to be leading although weary of chooks getting a few sets and scoring. We need at least two more tries to be a chance
 

Penrose Warrior

First Grade
Messages
9,462
That hasn’t mattered for other teams this year.
No, I know. That's the rule, but when you basically kiss the ground like Kosi did, I can't fathom why the defender gives the penalty away. There's literally nothing else he can do other than completely pull out of the tackle, which is never going to happen at pace. It goes against the feel of the game to penalise that. Even the JWH one, usually he hits across the chest - which you have to do to win the ruck.
 

Valheru

Coach
Messages
19,225
The no sin bin on Tedesco shows you exactly why fans of ‘shit teams’ believe there is a double standard

That should have been a bin.

Roosters should have got penalties for the warriors player running around his own man to get out of in goal and the kick they knocked on which was cleaned up by an offside warriors player. No one seems too fussed about those.
 

Mr. Shaman

First Grade
Messages
8,383
That should have been a bin.

Roosters should have got penalties for the warriors player running around his own man to get out of in goal and the kick they knocked on which was cleaned up by an offside warriors player. No one seems too fussed about those.
Was ruled a double knock on, Sue Ali touched it, therefore Aitken was fine to clean it up. As for your first complaint - HAHAHA bald merkin
 

Penrose Warrior

First Grade
Messages
9,462
That should have been a bin.

Roosters should have got penalties for the warriors player running around his own man to get out of in goal and the kick they knocked on which was cleaned up by an offside warriors player. No one seems too fussed about those.
The thing I don't understand, is the inconsistency of the Bunker weighing in after the fact. The line dropout that was (correctly) reversed from the Johnson kick, fine. Then we get instances like the knock on off that bomb that yeah, someone was offside, yet they don't weigh in then. When do they decide to do so?
 

Valheru

Coach
Messages
19,225
Was ruled a double knock on, Sue Ali touched it, therefore Aitken was fine to clean it up. As for your first complaint - HAHAHA bald merkin

Double knock on was the wrong decision then.

And he definitely ran around his own player which was the reason he didn't get tackled in goal. It was absolutely no different to the end of the half when the warriors player did the same thing but gave himself up and took the tackle.
 

Latest posts

Top