The Game 2023 NRL Match Review Charges & Judiciary

[League Unlimited News]

Bulldogs v Titans​

Tino Fa'asuamaleaui (Gold Coast)

• Grade 1 Dangerous Contact
• 28th minute, on Reed Mahoney
• Base penalty $1500
• 2nd offence last 12 months
• His options:
  $2500: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR $1800: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

Raiders v Sea Eagles​

Elliott Whitehead (Canberra) - two charges

• Grade 1 Dangerous Contact
• 74th minute, on Josh Schuster
• Base penalty $1500
• 3rd+ offence last 12 months
• His options:
  2 matches: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR $3000: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

AND

• Grade 1 Careless High Tackle
• 79th minute, on Brad Parker
• Base penalty $1500
• 3rd+ offence last 12 months
• His options:
  2 matches: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR $3000: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

NRL Match Review & Judiciary Charges: Round 12 » League Unlimited

leagueunlimited.com

 

[Munky]

Whitehead had a game to remember.

Two citations and a bombed try for the ages.

 

[Captain Apollo]

Radley has taken the early guilty plea.

Source: https://www.roosters.com.au/news/2023/05/20/nrl-judiciary-update-indigenous-round/

 

[League Unlimited News]

 

[Maximus]

Wait, Annesley didn't talk about the Radley headbutt at all in his weekly briefing?

 

[Saxon]

Wait, Annesley didn't talk about the Radley headbutt at all in his weekly briefing?

Nope.
Talked about the Mahoney hip-drop-that-wasn't (although not the Katoa one) but made it all about how good it was that no-one was suspended this week so the crackdown must be working, rather than how the refs/bunker f*cked up and obviously still don't actually know what a hip drop is.

 

[Maximus]

Nope.
Talked about the Mahoney hip-drop-that-wasn't (although not the Katoa one) but made it all about how good it was that no-one was suspended this week so the crackdown must be working, rather than how the refs/bunker f*cked up and obviously still don't actually know what a hip drop is.

So looks like they aren't even going with the "yeah we got that one wrong", they are just sweeping it under the rug.

 

[gerg]

But isn't their journos at his conference? If we can call rugby league journalists journalists? Probably more interested in making up shit.

 

[League Unlimited News]

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Elliott Matterhead

 

[yobbo84]

He's injured, smart move

 

[Timmah]

He's injured, smart move

If his goal is to save money I suppose that's true, but it doesn't avoid future loading - there's no points system now

 

[Bazal]

If his goal is to save money I suppose that's true, but it doesn't avoid future loading - there's no points system now

If he's out 2 weeks either way why spend 6k though?

Cop a meaningless ban for two weeks you're gonna miss anyway and keep some cash for the next time his scooter gets nicked

 

[Chimp]

If he's out 2 weeks either way why spend 6k though?

Cop a meaningless ban for two weeks you're gonna miss anyway and keep some cash for the next time his scooter gets nicked

Also means he retains his EGP, I’m sure you can only use it once for per charge type (there was a rule along these lines previously, but accept it may have changed).

 

[The Villain]

Nope.
Talked about the Mahoney hip-drop-that-wasn't (although not the Katoa one) but made it all about how good it was that no-one was suspended this week so the crackdown must be working, rather than how the refs/bunker f*cked up and obviously still don't actually know what a hip drop is.

Probably wrong thread. But did he say anything about the dogs putting in a captains challenge after watching the replay?
I didn’t care who won but this made me angry.

 

[Maximus]

Probably wrong thread. But did he say anything about the dogs putting in a captains challenge after watching the replay?
I didn’t care who won but this made me angry.

Yes, rules don't cover watching replays, just needs to be within the 10 sec period. It was within 10 secs so decision to allow the challenge was correct.

 

[The Villain]

Yes, rules don't cover watching replays, just needs to be within the 10 sec period. It was within 10 secs so decision to allow the challenge was correct.

Nope. I just checked.
Penalty was blown at 63:59
Challenge issued at 64:18

And this was after the replay was shown on the big screen.

I’m shocked nothing more was said. Sets a very dangerous precedent.

 

[Maximus]

Nope. I just checked.
Penalty was blown at 63:59
Challenge issued at 64:18

And this was after the replay was shown on the big screen.

I’m shocked nothing more was said. Sets a very dangerous precedent.

That was also covered. It's not when the whistle blows, it's when the ref advises what the decision is (which makes sense because how can you challenge a decision if you don't know what the decision is).

 

[League Unlimited News]

Dolphins v Dragons​

Kodi Nikorima (Dolphins)

• Grade 1 Careless High Tackle
• 6th minute, on Jack Bird
• Base penalty $1500
• 2nd offence last 12 months.
• His options:
  $2500: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR $1800: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

Ray Stone (Dolphins)

• Grade 1 Dangerous Throw
• 9th minute, on Ben Murdoch-Masila
• Base penalty $1500
• 2nd offence last 12 months
• His options:
  2 matches: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR $2500: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

Jack de Belin (Dragons)

• Grade 1 Dangerous Contact
• 28th minute, on Ray Stone
• Base penalty $1500
• His options:
  $2500: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR $1800: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

NRL Match Review & Judiciary Charges: Round 13 » League Unlimited

leagueunlimited.com

 

[League Unlimited News]

There were no charges from Parramatta v North Queensland on Friday.

NRL Match Review & Judiciary Charges: Round 13 » League Unlimited

leagueunlimited.com