Pete Cash
Post Whore
- Messages
- 62,165
All those ruck infringements were just ref bias, then.
How much did you lose on the game mate because you are seething harder than the tigers fans
All those ruck infringements were just ref bias, then.
Dude the only time your mob switched on was when they were against 12 men. You got a raft of six agains and penalties and did nothing with it.All those ruck infringements were just ref bias, then.
Maybe, maybe not. But not penalising a single ruck infringement from the Tigers absolutely was.All those ruck infringements were just ref bias, then.
You think I'm a Tigers fan?Dude the only time your mob switched on was when they were against 12 men. You got a raft of six agains and penalties and did nothing with it.
Sorry, was the obvious explanation for your bias. Guess you just lost the rent money instead.You think I'm a Tigers fan?
Haha, are you stoned?
That tinpot organisation can lick my hairy balls.
Pretty much this from mine. I'd replace bit with a lot, though.Well as a very non partisan viewer, Raiders did stretch the rules a bit and were rightly penalised, Tigers got their fortune in the sin inning and 19 points in5 minutes.
Then boom, a correct penalty and they get behind. Then wtf was Brooks doing running the ball wide on the 3rd tackle, then as the designated fg kicker , kept involved wide and not positioned in the the centre and calling for the ball. Suc dumb tactics, and then he squibs it. Terrible set up , at least miss it by being where you should be, terrible last set by the Tigers, end of.
Only an idiot gambles money.Sorry, was the obvious explanation for your bias. Guess you just lost the rent money instead.
yepAll those ruck infringements were just ref bias, then.
Question for our refs....
If the Fogarty field goal was actually successful, would there have been a penalty?
Raiders deserved to win that
8-0 on six against... come on now? Tigers perfect? Please
They had a ton of chances and until they got 12 on 13 they couldnt crack it. And the penalty to win the game... steve price ended f**king careers on dangerous shit like that. A penalty is mandatory, frankly i think that's a send off. He hits Fogarty slightly higher and we might be looking at ACL/MCL/Broken bones up and down the leg. Negligent play.
Tigers played more attractive football, but the Raiders played tougher. And rightly won the game.
I'd guess the MRC will deem that either no grading or Grade 1 ( fine) at worst.
If Brooks had a brain, he should have taken a dive to milk a penalty after his weak attempt (even though it would be unjustified)
My Raiders group chat just had this conversation and agreeYes, there should, but it wouldn't have happened.
Fogarty jumped backwards a little after the kick. I shudder to think what would have happened if he didn’t.My Raiders group chat just had this conversation and agree
if he kicks it, he gets up and celebrates and play on... which is wrong. Its such a dangerous play and apparently the rule book states (group chat mate looked at the rule book and found a rule about this) that we should have gotten the point and THEN the penalty
but it wouldnt have happened
Im glad they penalised it. That shit is so dangerous. He clipped fogs toes so no harm, no foul but that's a Steve Price special. it has to be penalised.