RedVee
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,104
That article mentions our record twice.What now you keep repeating yourself. Whats with the article posting twice with caps lock on?
It is spot on. You are the only one calling our 11 straight record a myth.
That article mentions our record twice.What now you keep repeating yourself. Whats with the article posting twice with caps lock on?
It is spot on. You are the only one calling our 11 straight record a myth.
I'm thinking someone of your vintage might need to take a Bex and go have a good lay down. Chill out dude. 11 in a row. 4 in a row. Different eras, different rules. Both great achievements in their own right.It seems your very challenged and confused, it's like at work, I tend to have to repeat to someone 4 times, due to selective hearing or playing the imbecile role of not accepting the truth about something, like how they broke something, but the damage occurred out of thin air.
FOR EXAMPLE WHEN YOU BUY A f**kING NEW CAR, and you scratch it or your run into your garage door and then try to claim warranty or blame the workmanship of it.
Follow, understand, get the picture, comprehend, grasp, make sense of, with it.
And the telecast showed a graphic with St George 11, Souths 5, then a bunch at 3 including Penrith. The narrative was a Penrith win lifts them above the other 3’s like Parra. They also then gave extra praise because of the salary cap era with Penrith losing players year on year.That article mentions our record twice.
It’s always played at Storms home games so I can only assume it was that.What was the bloody cowbell sound effect that was going on for a while?
Was it played over the PA? Cos it seemed bloody loud for someone in the crowd to be beating it.
Of courseSometimes I think the saying if they didn’t have double standards they would have no standards applies to the NRL. Munster cleared
Loading…
archive.md
They certainly missed him.Once big Nelson rubbed out it was strongly back in Panthers favour.
NAS plays it would have been a different game.
In todays world, I'm only early forties, anyways hopefully it will be the last we for both those teams.I'm thinking someone of your vintage might need to take a Bex and go have a good lay down. Chill out dude. 11 in a row. 4 in a row. Different eras, different rules. Both great achievements in their own right.
What everyone needs to be celebrating today is that the Purple Cheats lost.
FMD.Sometimes I think the saying if they didn’t have double standards they would have no standards applies to the NRL. Munster cleared
Loading…
archive.md
Was it the fake Melb crowd recording to make them feel like they had some support?What was the bloody cowbell sound effect that was going on for a while?
Was it played over the PA? Cos it seemed bloody loud for someone in the crowd to be beating it.
The Resurrection of Frank Facer is a start.Once again Penrith showed what the model is to win in the modern era, a strong club throughout every grade, minimal imports, very good coaches, GM, and recruitment. Compare this to the Dragons, barring a decent coach, there is nothing else in common.
Spot on rasaint, the club owe it to the Dragons fans to demand an explanation from the NRL of the reasons why Munster was not charged yet Kyle was.Since 77 good post on the Munster ‘no case’ to answer.
I saw the nearly exact circumstances occur in Munster situation to Flanagan Situation. That is a defence player ( Alamoti / Chricton) initially tackle an attacking player ( Munster / Flanagan) thereafter then move their arm or head up and attack the head of the tackled attacking player. Neither Munster nor Flanagan initiate any biting movement at all. Only move their heads to be free of a foremen or nose being push in their mouths.
I speculate that Amamoti‘s report was slow down and stop a storm attacking raid which was going well. Chricton trying to ‘show who is boss’
It looked like the grub was biting into a piece of T-bone steak , the only difference was he never swallowed .Spot on rasaint, the club owe it to the Dragons fans to demand an explanation from the NRL of the reasons why Munster was not charged yet Kyle was.
This is a disgraceful double standard that our club needs to grow a set and complain to the NRL.
Two things there GazzaIt looked like the grub was biting into a piece of T-bone steak , the only difference was he never swallowed .
But he will be in the Kangaroo squad so he must be innocent , isn’t he ?
I was unaware that he had made himself unavailable BLMO1 , however whether or not Alamoti withdrew his complaint or not , I still feel that there is sufficient doubt as to Munster’s actions to have the incident investigated further .Two things there Gazza
1. Munster ruled himself out of Test selection based on injury?.. he did seem fit enough to me
2. What did not help was Alamoti withdrawing his complaint. Crichton did not.
To be honest i did not see a bite (camera showing) from Munster, unfortunately in KF case we saw the chomp down on camera..mouth guard or notI was unaware that he had made himself unavailable BLMO1 , however whether or not Alamoti withdrew his complaint or not , I still feel that there is sufficient doubt as to Munster’s actions to have the incident investigated further .
A precedent has been set by the Judiciary with the Kyle Flanagan ruling , thus demanding some clarity for what actually constitutes ‘ biting ‘ . This is required in fairness not only to Flanagan , but to all players charged with the same offence in the future.