2024 Match Review & Judiciary charges

[League Unlimited News]

Thursday​

Penrith v Melbourne​

Nelson Asofa-Solomona (Melbourne)

• Grade 1 Careless High Tackle on Daine Laurie (55 min)
• Base penalty $1500
• 2nd offence last 12 months
• His options:
  Early plea - $1800
  Guilty at panel / no contest - $2500
• PLEA: TBC

Mitch Kenny (Penrith)

• Grade 2 Careless High Tackle on Grant Anderson (71 min)
• Base penalty 2 matches
• His options:
  Early plea - 1 match
  Guilty at panel / no contest - 2 matches
• PLEA: TBC

NRL Match Review & Judiciary Charges: 2024 Round 24 and NRLW Round 4 » League Unlimited

leagueunlimited.com

 

[Someguy]

If Kenny tackle was worse than NAS why no bin?

 

[Captain Apollo]

If Kenny tackle was worse than NAS why no bin?

,
Guys like Cooper Cronk were saying that on Fox Sports last night as Kenny's tackle looked as bad, if not worse, than NAS'.

 

[mozza91]

If Kenny tackle was worse than NAS why no bin?

PENRITH!

 

[Chins get the wins]

Kenny's was a rugby league tackle gone bad.

NAS threw a dogshot to the back of the head of a stationary player with a clenched fist.

 

[Captain Apollo]

Kenny's was a rugby league tackle gone bad.

NAS threw a dogshot to the back of the head of a stationary player with a clenched fist.

Then explain why the "dogshot" is getting a fine, whilst Kenny is looking at a 2 match suspension? Your explanation does not compute I'm sorry to say (and I'm no fan of NAS).

 

[Chins get the wins]

Then explain why the "dogshot" is getting a fine, whilst Kenny is looking at a 2 match suspension? Your explanation does not compute I'm sorry to say (and I'm no fan of NAS).

The NRL has it backwards

 

[Apey]

I'm shocked that NAS's shot wasn't actually as bad as the pearl clutchers in the game thread and Klein/the Bunker thought it was. He's a thug but there was nothing in this one.

 

[dogslife]

I'm shocked that NAS's shot wasn't actually as bad as the pearl clutchers in the game thread and Klein/the Bunker thought it was. He's a thug but there was nothing in this one.

It's certainly the first time I've ever seen a man binned for clubbing his own team mate

 

[Saxon]

If Kenny tackle was worse than NAS why no bin?

Klown and Sutton.

 

[Saxon]

Kenny's was a rugby league tackle gone bad.

NAS threw a dogshot to the back of the head of a stationary player with a clenched fist.

Rubbish. Fist came nowhere near a Panther.

 

[soc123_au]

Rubbish. Fist came nowhere near a Panther.

Shoulder hit Lauries head plain as day. It's only that NAS is an unco Mong that Munster copped the swinging arm.

 

[League Unlimited News]

Friday​

Manly v Warriors​

Reuben Garrick (Manly)

• Grade 1 Dangerous Contact on Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad (74 min)
• Base penalty $1500
• 2nd offence last 12 months
• His options:
  Early plea - $1800
  Guilty at panel / no contest - $2500
• PLEA: TBC

Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad (Warriors)​

• Grade 1 Crusher Tackle on Nathan Brown (79 min)
• Base penalty $2000
• 2nd offence last 12months
• His options:
  Early plea - $3000
  Guilty at panel / no contest - 2 matches
• PLEA: TBC

Sydney v Parramatta​

Victor Radley (Sydney)

• Grade 1 Dangerous Contact on Shaun Lane (7 min)
• Base penalty $1500
• 2nd offence last 12 months
• His options:
  Early plea - $1800
  Guilty at panel / no contest - $2500

Clinton Gutherson (Parramatta)​

• Grade 1 Dangerous Contact on James Tedesco (14 min)
• Base penalty $1500
• 3yr incident free discount
• His options:
  Early plea - $750
  Guilty at panel / no contest - $1000
• PLEA: TBC

Wiremu Greig (Parramatta)​

• Grade 3 Careless High Tackle on Connor Watson (15 min)
• Base penalty 3 matches
• His options:
  Early plea - 2 matches
  Guilty at panel / no contest - 3 matches
• PLEA: TBC

 

[Chins get the wins]

Nuffo gets a fine for kicking someone in the head. The system is so broken

 

[Bazal]

Nuffo gets a fine for kicking someone in the head. The system is so broken

Shouldn't have even been a penalty Bebe

 

[Captain Apollo]

Okay, thanks to Michael Carrayanis in today's Telegraph for explaining a change about a change to the NRL judiciary which was introduced at the start of the season, which looks like none of us here knew about.

The following excerpt is from this column today about the lack of success by players challenging charges at the judiciary (source: https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/s...e/news-story/643cc6814188455e30b8b40361442caf). As it is behind a paywall, I took a photo of the relevant part of the column below with the important text highlighted in yellow -



This may explain why some of the players who've had 3 of more level 1 charges during this season may have avoided suspension.

 

[dogslife]

Okay, thanks to Michael Carrayanis in today's Telegraph for explaining a change about a change to the NRL judiciary which was introduced at the start of the season, which looks like none of us here knew about.

The following excerpt is from this column today about the lack of success by players challenging charges at the judiciary (source: https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/s...e/news-story/643cc6814188455e30b8b40361442caf). As it is behind a paywall, I took a photo of the relevant part of the column below with the important text highlighted in yellow -

View attachment 92600

This may explain why some of the players who've had 3 of more level 1 charges during this season may have avoided suspension.

JWH would've been on 450 games if they brought this in 10 years ago

 

[Saxon]

Friday​

​

Sydney v Parramatta​

Victor Radley (Sydney)

• Grade 1 Dangerous Contact on Shaun Lane (7 min)
• Base penalty $1500
• 2nd offence last 12 months
• His options:
  Early plea - $1800
  Guilty at panel / no contest - $2500

Saw an article only yesterday about how Radley had changed his ways and hadn't been reported all year...

**Edit, I lie. Had only been reported once this year.
Repeat offender to clean skin

 

[Warrimoo3]

Okay, thanks to Michael Carrayanis in today's Telegraph for explaining a change about a change to the NRL judiciary which was introduced at the start of the season, which looks like none of us here knew about.

The following excerpt is from this column today about the lack of success by players challenging charges at the judiciary (source: https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/s...e/news-story/643cc6814188455e30b8b40361442caf). As it is behind a paywall, I took a photo of the relevant part of the column below with the important text highlighted in yellow -

View attachment 92600

This may explain why some of the players who've had 3 of more level 1 charges during this season may have avoided suspension.

Another random rule change seemingly plucked out of the air by the NRL. Tried to make it look like it like the changes were the result of extensive deliberation.

“Hey I’ve got an idea. Let’s just multiply the grading by 10. Where’s my calculator?

 

[Warrimoo3]

Okay, thanks to Michael Carrayanis in today's Telegraph for explaining a change about a change to the NRL judiciary which was introduced at the start of the season, which looks like none of us here knew about.

The following excerpt is from this column today about the lack of success by players challenging charges at the judiciary (source: https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/s...e/news-story/643cc6814188455e30b8b40361442caf). As it is behind a paywall, I took a photo of the relevant part of the column below with the important text highlighted in yellow -

View attachment 92600

This may explain why some of the players who've had 3 of more level 1 charges during this season may have avoided suspension.

Another random rule change seemingly plucked out of the air by the NRL. Tried to make it look like the changes were the result of extensive deliberation.

“Hey I’ve got an idea. Let’s just multiply the grading by 10. Where’s my calculator