What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2024 TV and Streaming Ratings Discussion

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,437
asset sits on the AFLs accounts with a book value of 136m.

View attachment 95399

ROI is determined by return on the AFLS investment - the initial 286m, not theoretical value if sold. The AFL is getting about 8-10% ROI, which is well within an acceptable "good" ROI.
Yesterday you were saying it was worth up to 1.1 billion

Now you are using a much lower figure to justify an awful roi

lol
 

The_Wookie

Bench
Messages
3,232
Yesterday you were saying it was worth up to 1.1 billion

Now you are using a much lower figure to justify an awful roi

lol

You completely misunderstood what ROI actually is then.

It was valued in 2016 at 1.1 billion - if it was sold off. Sale value and book value are not the same thing. and ROI is based literally on "return on investment" - which in the AFLs case was the 286m they paid,
 

Frank Burge

Juniors
Messages
272
asset sits on the AFLs accounts with a book value of 136m.

View attachment 95399

ROI is determined by return on the AFLS investment - the initial 286m, not theoretical value if sold. The AFL is getting about 8-10% ROI, which is well within an acceptable "good" ROI.
If that land was sold is it only for certain use ie. stadium or public asset or can they build units on it ? 1.3b valuation is massive for the land if it is the former
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,437
You completely misunderstood what ROI actually is then.

It was valued in 2016 at 1.1 billion - if it was sold off. Sale value and book value are not the same thing. and ROI is based literally on "return on investment" - which in the AFLs case was the 286m they paid,

Opportunity cost
 

The_Wookie

Bench
Messages
3,232
If that land was sold is it only for certain use ie. stadium or public asset or can they build units on it ? 1.3b valuation is massive for the land if it is the former

They can demolish it and build whatever as long as it meets regulatory approvals. the surrounding area is zoned commercial - you could build a lot of commercial propery on 20,000 sqm.

One of the stated advantages is the existence of the 2,500 space underground car park. Apparently they are quite expensive to build.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,437
selling office space is not the same thing as land value. And the AFL has a tonne of land.
Land values for unit sites have collapsed around Australia in general due to a huge increase in construction costs

Victoria has the added problem of property taxes rising heavily to cover covid debts

Development sites around Melbourne are being fire sold
 

The_Wookie

Bench
Messages
3,232
Yes it does

Sell the ground and invest In high earning assets

You can make up whatever definition you like, but thats not what ROI is here. The AFL invested 286m, and is getting an 8-10% return in recent years, thats good by pretty much anyones definition.

The land value talk is just nonsense to cover up you being wrong here.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,469
You can make up whatever definition you like, but thats not what ROI is here. The AFL invested 286m, and is getting an 8-10% return in recent years, thats good by pretty much anyones definition.

The land value talk is just nonsense to cover up you being wrong here.
Give it up, he thinks buying something for $286mill that is worth $1bill 8 years later and returns $25mill ayear profit is a bad thing. He’s clueless.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,437
You can make up whatever definition you like, but thats not what ROI is here. The AFL invested 286m, and is getting an 8-10% return in recent years, thats good by pretty much anyones definition.

The land value talk is just nonsense to cover up you being wrong here.
They could’ve sold it and put the money in an asset that makes ten percent vs two percent

And now all their equity is tied into an asset whose value is falling

lol
 

The_Wookie

Bench
Messages
3,232
They could’ve sold it and put the money in an asset that makes ten percent vs two percent

And now all their equity is tied into an asset whose value is falling

lol

According to you. Who doesnt apparently know anything about land value in the Melbourne CBD.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,437
According to you. Who doesnt apparently know anything about land value in the Melbourne CBD.









 
Last edited:

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,569




That's Greenfield property. Not prime land in Australia's biggest Capital City CBD.

Owning a stadium should be an aspiration for the NRL. Saying land on Caxton St is more valuable than the Melbourne CBD certainly is a take
 

The_Wookie

Bench
Messages
3,232










Youve literally just done what i said you were doing, Stop waffling on about housing and residential real estate,

And it still has nothing to do with ROI on the AFLs investment.
 

Latest posts

Top