hindy111
Post Whore
- Messages
- 62,788
If you were any more full of shit it would be oozing out your pores.
You made the statement that the Sharts had the best backline in the comp. Hindy refuted that stupid statement straight away and instead of ever admitting you were wrong you want to move the goalposts and dribble shit about best value for money and the roosters don’t count blah blah blah blah.
Just admit you were wrong and outsmarted by a much sharper footballing mind so we can all move on with our day.
Gronkles knowledge of RL - below average.The Sharks backline is average
The Sharks forwards are average
The Sharks spine is below average
They had a soft draw but still did well to make top 4. At full strength we'd handle them. They won't play finals in 2025 unless another soft draw.
They are paying Hynes over a million a season for 7 years. They could be overpaying others as well.You are back tracking. Plus you don't know what they or other backlines are being paid.
Penaut
Better coaching?If it was that easy and comps were based on backline quality, the Roosters would win. However it’s far more complicated than that, right?
Hopefully it's only the one person on the forum convinced (by their own repeated mantra) that coaches aren't responsible for anything... I trust the intellect of fellow forum members can see through that particular failed #poulogic.Better coaching?
Sorry mate didn’t mean to upset you, but it looks like you’ve been outsmarted, and then you’ve attempted to shift the goal posts.Well, Sir, I don't know what the Sharks backline is on. Just as much as I don't know what the Roosters backline is on.
However sometimes, you can choose to open your eyes or just be a smartarse when it comes to value.
View attachment 94810
View attachment 94812
The Sharks backline is average
The Sharks forwards are average
The Sharks spine is below average
They had a soft draw but still did well to make top 4. At full strength we'd handle them. They won't play finals in 2025 unless another soft draw.
That’s weird, you’d think the best back line in the comp would have no problems scoring points.So Annesley admits the bunker f**ked up, and the Panther try pulled back when Talakai played for fake obstruction should have been allowed...
Which by implication means the Sharks should never have scored their lone try on the next set - and yet again would have remained pointless against the Panthers.
Hey Ivan, you were right: NRL confirm bunker blunder
The NRL confirmed the Bunker got it wrong denying a try to Penrith’s Sunia Turuva – and why the Roosters were also hurt by a decision on Friday night.www.smh.com.au
The best backline in the comp have scored 16 points in the last 4 games against the Panthers.That’s weird, you’d think the best back line in the comp would have no problems scoring points.
They're really good at the 1%'s too....The best backline in the comp have scored 16 points in the last 4 games against the Panthers.
3 tries in 320 mins of footy.
Thats on average 1 try every 106.5 mins
They have no problems whatsoever.
You seem like a new poster Eel CandySorry mate didn’t mean to upset you, but it looks like you’ve been outsmarted, and then you’ve attempted to shift the goal posts.
Gronkles is a people person.You seem like a new poster Eel Candy
Seeing your response has Gronk already rubbed you up the wrong way this early into your LU posting career.
The Sharks backline is average
The Sharks forwards are average
The Sharks spine is below average