Willow said:
Why does it even have to be a player? There would have load of people coming and going, some of whom had nothing to do with the team.
Fair dinkum, some folks just want to gossip for the sake of it.
Which was the jist of Webcke and Lockyer's comments from memory... that the culprit had nothing to do with the team.
From all reports of those in the know with a bit of experience, Villa seemed to be made a scapegoat as he was a loner.
Final point on whether the Tigers should sign Villa - his form has been ordinary since 2003. He really has hit a brick wall in his career. In that regard, if you're looking for a no nonsense hard hitting defensive forward I'd be looking no further than Nigel Plum who has a magnificent tackle technique.
I think all league fans who haven't speculated and second guessed what may or may not have happened would love to see a return to the "Gorilla", I just don't see it happening any time soon. That said, his efforts particularly in 2003 to galvanise the pack into a feared force that was a couple of dropped balls off beating Penrith, and IMO, would have beaten the Chookies in the GF, were outstanding. If he could rekindle that form, he'd be the best buy of any club for 2007.