BunniesMan
Immortal
- Messages
- 33,738
His bowling looked more promising than his keeping.
And plus Hughesy looked good with the gloves on.
I'm all for this move.
And plus Hughesy looked good with the gloves on.
I'm all for this move.
And plus Hughesy looked good with the gloves on.
No one wants to know about your anal fisting
Silly because Warner bowls. If you're going to give the gloves to someone it should be someone that doesn't bowl. Cowan, Hughes or Khawaja.the article said the gloves could be given to Warner. Let's hope they are
WTF???? Starc just makes hius mark for Australia and is rotated out of the side for that f**king Hack??? I give up i truly do these f**king selectors need to be f**king shot!!Bird in for...Starc. Fmd. Johnson playing, Starc dropped aka rotated.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...starc-misses-out/story-e6frey50-1226542081672
This. Never agreed with anything you've said more than this. There is zero evidence it works.didn't Starc just win us a test match ?
so what do we do, we drop him
that'll do me
there is no evidence that the rotation system works and we are the only country that do it and we have more injured players than any other country
what a joke
SauceJackson Bird's shock debut at expense of Mitchell Starc highlights pacemen no longer play series
By Malcolm Conn
December 22
Welcome to the future, where rotation becomes reality.
How big the block is depends on their age, injury history and workload.
After bowling almost 100 overs in the past two Tests, data from Australia's support staff highlights that Starc is at serious risk of breaking down if he continues playing.
That he is just 22 and has only six Tests to his credit reinforces that view, meaning he will play just one of the next two Tests.
It will be devastating for Starc missing the Boxing Day Test in Melbourne, the biggest day on the cricketing calendar.
But it would be more devastating for him and his teammates if Starc broke down during the match and missed playing his first home Test in Sydney early in the new year, and the remainder of the season.
A significant injury now means he would struggle to prove his fitness for the Indian tour from mid-February and fall back in the queue for the Ashes mid-year.
This is not the first time Australia will use the often talked about rotation policy but it will be the most contentious after Starc claimed 14 wickets in the past two Tests, including a match-winning 5-63 on the last day in Hobart.
During Australia's tour of West Indies in April Ryan Harris, who has a long injury history, was man of the match in Barbados but was rested from the second Test in Trindad before returning for the third.
While there were understandable fears about Harris breaking down, the irony was that Peter Siddle and James Pattinson both broke down in the only Test they played and were sent home.
Pattinson, who has broken down four times this year, is currently out with a side strain suffered during the second Test against South Africa in Adelaide.
There is considerable angst that he is missing yet again, with Cricket Australia's high performance manager, Pat Howard, saying this week that he will be more closely monitored in future.
Last season the sports science data showed that Pattinson was in danger of breaking down in the Sydney Test, and did, but he had made such a big impact in Melbourne it was considered worth the risk.
Things have clearly changed. Starc will not be risked.
I copy pasted that, so yes, they did misspell AustraliaDo Australa's fast bowlers need to toughen up?
Yes, this resting is ridiculous
77.88%
No, science is the safe way
22.12%
caption needed![]()