undertaker
Coach
- Messages
- 10,998
:lol:Sorry, I meant when Khawaja is BACK, that he replaces S Marsh. I was dealing with an eBay transaction at the same time I typed that.
What i wanted to know was "were the boys thirsty"???
Like i said earlier in the thread (im only guessing) they wanted 11 to be able to sprint a single if it comes to it. With the field up and boult with two balla left i think they expected boult to either bowl him or starc to hit a four.
Australia fast bowler Mitchell Starc may yet be available for the tour of New Zealand early next year after examination of his broken right foot revealed he does not require surgery and will be able to resume training in less than a month.
Starc suffered a stress fracture in the third metatarsal of his right foot, something the assistant coach Craig McDermott said may have been as a result of compensating for the painful "impingement" or bone spurs in his heel/ankle. That issue has been affecting Starc since the first Test of the Ashes series earlier this year.
Apart from a brief, brave appearance while batting on the second afternoon, Starc has cut a disconsolate figure with crutches and a "moon boot" to support the injured foot. However McDermott said early fears about his availability for next year's early assignments had eased. Nevertheless, Australia must find other pace resources against West Indies in Tests and India in ODIs before the New Zealand tour.
"He's got a crack on the top of his foot," McDermott told ABC Grandstand radio. "He's had a heel impingement which may have affected that, who knows, trying to compensate for landing on his heel he may have put more pressure on the front of his foot and that's eventuated in a crack.
"The good news for us is it's not going to be as long as we thought, so he's going to be out for three weeks and then we can work on him from there. Hopefully we can get him up for the New Zealand series and the World Twenty20 where he's ranked No. 1 in the world.
"All the way through England and the one-day series he's had his heel impingement. In the last 12 months he's done an unbelievable job."
Running his eye over Australia's bowling stocks, McDermott mentioned the West Australian Nathan Coulter-Nile - suspended this week from Sheffield Shield cricket on a dissent charge - in addition to James Pattinson. He also spoke approvingly of Joel Paris and Billy Stanlake, though admitting both needed more match experience.
"James Pattinson went back to Perth and he gets to bowl tomorrow, the Vics are batting today, he was pretty close to playing here, so with him back we've got our three quicks and Mitchell Marsh," McDermott said. "After that we've got Nathan Coulter-Nile, if he can keep his tongue wired it would be great, and then we can get him involved if he bowls well enough as well.
"Certainly we wouldn't want too many more injuries, because then we get down past the blokes who are bowling 140kph plus, and that's the way we like to put our bowling attack together. Joel Paris is very skilful in all formats, he's had a bad run of injuries ... he just needs to make sure his pace is up. Billy's got the pace, but we need to get him through a fair bit more cricket before he gets into this sort of arena."
Da f**k? There was two days left bro
Roshan Mahanama
[Youtube]X4jbq9SVxAc[/youtube]
If you were better you would have won. This is an australian side with about twenty caps between them and had their best fast bowler go down. We still won. I think we also batted better against the moving ball at twilight. You guys didnt have to play starc either. Him running in at full fitness in the evening day 2 wed have bowled you guys out in a session.
You will never have a better chance to beat us in australia and you lost to two marsh brothers and a fast bowler you described as plodding
He has 200 wickets. Add that to the list of reasons nz failed....conditions that suited them at adelaide.
It was a bad umpiring decision but guess what thats cricket. Simon Katich got one of the worst lbws ever when we were following on at trent bridge in 05 where even an extra 50 runs for warne to bowl at and we very well could have pulled off a famous comeback...we only lost by 3 wickets and you dont see me saying that umpiring cost us that game.
If australia is going to get a shocker of an umpire call go against us ill have it on the oppositions number 11 everytime.
Bad decision, yes. I'd be Lyon if it wasn't.
But nz then bled another 100 to the tail.