baggygreen man
Bench
- Messages
- 4,442
Outside of the openers, Agar had one of the best knocks for the PM X1 against the Windies. He is a sweet timer of a cricket ball.If Agar is picked it will be because of his batting
Outside of the openers, Agar had one of the best knocks for the PM X1 against the Windies. He is a sweet timer of a cricket ball.If Agar is picked it will be because of his batting
Missed the point. He's not being picked as a batsman. If he's picked its because they are picking a second spinner. He is not the best second spinner we've got.Outside of the openers, Agar had one of the best knocks for the PM X1 against the Windies. He is a sweet timer of a cricket ball.
Fill me inYeah you missed the point
No as a slow bowling batting all rounder. Otherwise they can take Swepson, Murphy or Kuhnemann to India.He's not being picked as a batsman
Green has been the only all rounder good enough to play test cricket for Australia in 30 years. Watson was useless, Symonds was ok I guess.Fill me in
Now you're cherry picking parts of my post to make yourself look cerebral.No as a slow bowling batting all rounder. Otherwise they can take Swepson, Murphy or Kuhnemann to India.
With respect Agar is not an offie, he is a left arm orthodox. Perhaps you meant to type 'we dont need two finger spinners'.we don't need 2 offfies
How am I cherry picking or trying to big note myself. That is not me. You misunderstood. You said Agar is not being picked as a batsman. Correct he is not. Nor is he being picked as a bowler. He is being picked for his dual disciplines, batting and bowling. My bringing up the other three was to emphasize that they are all superior bowlers to Agar but they do not bat.. and being an all rounder is the reason I believe CA has picked him.Now you're cherry picking parts of my post to make yourself look cerebral.
You're embarrassing yourself baggs.
He’s trying to ruffle your feathers AG, don’t cop his BS.Now you're cherry picking parts of my post to make yourself look cerebral.
You're embarrassing yourself baggs.
That's what I said you pelican.No I am not. You said Agar is not being picked as a batsman. Correct he is not. Nor is he being picked as a bowler. He is being picked for his dual disciplines, batting and bowling. How is that being cerebral or big noting myself. You misunderstood my bringing up the other three as it was to emphasize that they are all superior bowlers to Agar but they do not bat.. and being an all rounder is the reason I believe CA has picked him.
No the Bald Canberra Fan is trying to ruffle my feathers. I wont cop his BS.He’s trying to ruffle your feathers AG, don’t cop his BS.
How was I cherry picking your post and being cerebral. Explain yourself man. Or are you just pulling my chain. Boy you are hard to work out.That's what I said you pelican.
You faced an over of Morris by the looks.
With respect Agar is not an offie, he is a left arm orthodox. Perhaps you meant to type 'we dont need two finger spinners'.
That's briskBut one of those will be Feathers Morris who will take all 20 wickets with his 300km/hr thunderbolts.
Should we lend them Marcus Harris?
![]()
Theunis de Bruyn to miss Sydney Test for birth of first child
The batter will return home meaning the visitors will need to make at least one change to their line-upwww.espncricinfo.com
On a one way ticket to SA?
Absolutely
Gut says they will rest Boland, I don’t agree with it but they probably will.
Morris for Starc you need some genuine pace without him it’s basically 3 fast medium hit the pitch bowlers. They tend to like a strike bowler, Morris was called for backup for Starc before Brisbane.
Renshaw or Agar plays at 6. Meh the bald bloke is useless Head’s non spinning whatever’s are just as good. However the alternatives are horrible, Swepson out of form and can’t bat, Kuhermann can’t bat, Zampa can’t bat…Murphy probably the best one and he’s another off spinner. I’d personally go Renshaw as I don’t rate Agar one bit as a bowler.