It's not going to happen given the current weather in Wellington, but how funny would it be if all of a sudden a few dark clouds hovered around and it started raining, the match couldn't continue and finished as a no-result (as a minimum 20 overs is required for a result in ODIs via Duckworth-Lewis, and NZ only have faced 9 overs) with NZ 12 runs short of victory?
Pakistan won the '92 World Cup. However, a match in their run to World Cup glory that not many people talk about was when they played England at Adelaide Oval:
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/65130.html
Pakistan were skittled for 74, and England were 1/24 off 8 overs before the match was washed out, hence both teams got a point. In the end, that point edged Australia out of 4th spot and subequently, a semi-final spot.
Many people talk about NZ's final group game vs Pakistan and say that NZ deliberately threw their last pool game against Pakistan to allow Pakistan in the semi-finals so they would get a home-final in Auckland against them instead of having to play Australia in Sydney (which is what would've happened, because that was the compromise in exchange for hosting their match vs Australia in Auckland instead of in Australia). However, that would've been irrelevant if the England vs Pakistan match wasn't washed out and England won and putting a huge dent in Pakistan's net run rate, as even if NZ intentionally threw that game vs Pakistan, Australia finished on a superior net run-rate to Pakistan and both teams would've ended up on equal pts with Australia having the better net run rate and getting 4th position. England bowled superbly that day and were on target for a crushing win, but in the context of that tournament, Pakistan - irrespective of the star players they had - got lucky when it mattered the most.
