What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

9th ODI: Australia v Sri Lanka at Hobart Feb 24, 2012

aussies1st

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
28,154
Harris looked alright at the death, should have kept him going but it seems Clarke is looking to the WC by giving Christian a go.
 

IanG

Coach
Messages
17,807
Australia 6 for 280 (50 overs)
Peter Forrest 104 (138)
Michael Clarke 72 (79)
David Hussey 40 (28) no
Angelo Mathews 2 for 43 (7 overs)
Farfeez Maharoof 1 for 40 (10 overs)

Sri Lanka 7 for 283 (49.2 overs)
Mahala Jayawardene 85 (81)
Dinesh Chandimal 80 (100)
Angelo Mathews 24 (31)
Dan Christian 3 for 53 (8 overs)
Ben Hilfenhaus 2 for 51 (10 overs)

Sri Lanka won by 3 wickets (with 4 balls remaining)

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say never mind India I think Sri Lanka are the team that will trouble Australia. Still this is the one that got away
 

AlwaysGreen

Post Whore
Messages
51,454
Two things. Sri Lanka are a very decent side and deserved their win. Australia need a bowler who can bowl Yorkers and slower balls, including the slow bouncer, at the end of an innings consistently. Lee used to be that guy but probably not now.

Thirdly, India are last on the table and hopefully will be gonski this time Sunday.
 

Xfactor1979

Bench
Messages
2,630
Not to name names, but what a terrible effort from DAN CHRISTIAN this game

Comprehensively stumped when even Brett Lee could hang in there and then leaking runs with the ball. And then buckled under pressure when bowling yorkers was the order of the day to Thisara
 
Messages
15,353
Two things. Sri Lanka are a very decent side and deserved their win. Australia need a bowler who can bowl Yorkers and slower balls, including the slow bouncer, at the end of an innings consistently. Lee used to be that guy but probably not now.

Thirdly, India are last on the table and hopefully will be gonski this time Sunday.

We've been lacking a good death bowler since Bracken retired. Watson goes alright, but none of the others are very good at it.
 

Xfactor1979

Bench
Messages
2,630
the best way to avoid the need for a death bowler is to decimate the opposition to 6 for 20 or 7 for 23

we'll all be much happier then
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
Doherty bowled beautifully, why Hussey only bowled one over I don't understand.
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
69,397
I was reading something the other day about the Australian selectors wanting to save Siddle for tests only. I should pull it up for you guys

Yeah I read that as well, was gonna put it in the siddle the magnificent thread :cool:
 

Hallatia

Referee
Messages
26,433
Selectors want Siddle as Test-only for now
Daniel Brettig
February 22, 2012

Peter Siddle will be unleashed in the West Indies as a Test match spearhead rather than taking part in Australia's forthcoming ODI assignments, the national selector John Inverarity has said.

In a sign that the selectors are shaping Siddle into Michael Clarke's equivalent of the kind of role Merv Hughes performed for Allan Border in the 1990s, Inverarity said the panel wanted Siddle to maintain the "lionhearted" standards he set against New Zealand and India, rather than adjusting his plans for the demands of ODIs.

In a similar fashion, Hughes played few limited-overs matches for Australia, as the panel then chaired by Laurie Sawle preferred the Victorian fast man to give his all in Test matches, where he commonly took the critical wickets in sharp spells. Siddle now appears to be treading a path similar to the one that took Hughes to 212 Test wickets.

"His bowling during the Test matches was outstanding, and we really look forward to letting him loose in the West Indies," Inverarity told ESPNcricinfo. "He was lionhearted and wonderful [against India] and we look forward to him returning there. But just at the moment he's not in our short-term ODI plans."

Under Clarke, Siddle has commonly been used in shorter, more incisive Test match spells than those he delivered under Ricky Ponting, also benefiting from the fuller length and discipline advocated by the bowling coach Craig McDermott - Hughes' former pace partner. Against India he repeatedly broke key partnerships before Ben Hilfenhaus and others cleaned up in his wake, until Siddle had his reward with a Man-of-the-Match haul in the final Test in Adelaide.

In his absence, the Australian limited-overs squad is re-assembling in Hobart for Friday's ODI against Sri Lanka. Xavier Doherty, the Tasmanian left-arm spinner, will play his first international on his home ground, and said there would be a decidedly different feel to the dressing room in Ponting's absence after he was dropped from the one-day side.

"It's going to be very different," Doherty said. "Having Ricky around for the last 15-16 years, he's the guy who's got all the energy in the group so that role's probably going to have to shift to someone else now. So it's going to be a very different feel and probably different for the public to come to watch.

"Like Ricky said, if you don't put the runs on or take the wickets then you leave yourself up for this sort of outcome. It is unfortunate that this is the way it's gone, but in professional sport that is the way things go."

Doherty has bowled reliably across the series, often entrusted with later overs in the innings, where his variations in pace, accuracy and occasional spin have prospered.

"Early on in the tournament I probably took wickets, which is the credit for some of the other guys doing the hard work," Doherty said. "In the last couple of games it's probably me doing some of the hard work and they've been the ones to get the rewards, so I feel pretty comfortable in the team now, it's taken a little while to settle in, but I feel like I can do whatever's asked of me."

As a limited-overs spinner, Doherty said he had been aided by his experiences in Twenty20 matches, which placed greater emphasis on him to be precise every time he delivered the ball.

"There's no doubt that T20 cricket is having an impact on the other forms," he said. "You have a look at Dave Warner's progression, Malinga, it's cut-throat stuff in T20, whereas in 50-over cricket you do get a little bit more leeway so the skills of T20 are definitely rubbing off on some of the other forms. A lot of people have negative things to say about T20 but I think from my point of view it's all positive."
Sauce
 

Latest posts

Top