What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

AFL drowning in money....

Tidus_Raider

Bench
Messages
2,576
www.news.com.au

FOOTBALL's hottest topic - broadcast rights - will dominate today's AFL Commission strategy meeting in Melbourne.

While several big-picture issues will be addressed, the agenda for the gathering will focus on last week's dramatic developments in broadcast negotiations.

AFL chief executive Andrew Demetriou will address commissioners on the ramifications of the Channel 7/Channel 10 union.

While the AFL was shocked at the alliance that leaves the Nine network on the outer, it remains confident its broadcast bundle, including free-to-air, pay-TV and internet, will reap up to $130 million a year.

Early feedback from the Nine network has indicated it will provide some form of challenge to the Seven-Ten bid, possibly through teaming with another media outlet.

News Limited and Telstra are considering their options.

Also to be discussed at the commission meeting today will be next year's Commonwealth Games-affected fixture.

With the MCG unavailable for the opening six rounds, several alternatives, including Carrara, need to be analysed.

Investments at Carrara, Launceston's Aurora Stadium and in west Sydney regions are being considered.

The future use of Optus Oval, which will host the last of 1277 officially sanctioned matches in Round 9 this year, is also likely to be discussed.

The AFL wants the Kangaroos to share the facility with Carlton and possibly the umpiring department.

It will not contribute to refurbishment of the stadium until at least two outside parties agree to share the venue with the Blues.

Key Roos officials had recently publicly backed staying at Arden St.

But the AFL and City of Melbourne told the club two weeks ago that financial assistance for redeveloping a future home base would be linked to a move to Optus Oval.

Herald Sun

------------------------------


Is this a typing error??? 130 million per year in the Australian sporting landscape is extroadinary. How much is league raking in at the moment and how much will they try to rake in when the pay TV and free to air contracts come up for renewal.

The only downside with 7 and 10 getting the AFL is that I dont think they will even bother making an offer for the league which means no competition for 9, and 9 competition equates to decreased markey value.
 

Balmain_Boy

Guest
Messages
4,801
Sickening. We need another TV station in this country desperately. Just when it looked like we'd be getting good money finally, we get F***ed over by something we can't control. Not happy.
 

griff

Bench
Messages
3,322
The AFL rights are waay over valued. Nine makes a loss of about $6m a year on its AFL coverage. Ten makes a small profit of about $3m, because of its finals coverage. Fox would be losing money as well, as they have made no secret that AFL hasn't been a strong a driver of new subscriptions as they hoped, largely because there is so much AFL on FTA that fans don't really have to buy Foxtel. Telstra also pay something ridiculous for the internet rights to AFL ($5-6m a year).

NRL makes only about $52m a year cash out of its rights.
 

Foz

Bench
Messages
4,124
I dont follow AFL but I was scrolling down the channels last night on Fox and saw a program Couch (On The Couch,Sitting On the Couch-Something like that) and I was going to scroll straight through when I heard them talking about some Afl coach from Carlton currently has a deal of $800k a season.
The guys contract is up and the commentators were mentioning they expect him to retain his $800k package as he is the number 2 coach in the country.
The commentators then said that they believe the coach should get as much or more as the top players.
I think they mentioned some player would be on close to a million so the top player should be on a million.
I kept scrolling through the channels straight after this but it made me think what our Rugby League Coaches are on.
Is anyone on a million dollars a year?
I'd have thought most coaches would be on $200-$300k but am I still living in the nineties?
 

mr panama

Juniors
Messages
183
i think you'll find the top nrl coaches would be on around $400k/year. i never realised how much money afl coaches are on these days. it make the mind boggle. :shock:

on the telecast rights issue, it's funny that the satanic :twisted: seven :twisted: network are teaming up with ten for the rights. it was revealed that seven are actually taking ten to court because they 'claim' that ten and the other networks 'stole' the rights off them in 2001. a very interesting time ahead.
 

Hoops

Juniors
Messages
270
mr panama said:
on the telecast rights issue, it's funny that the satanic :twisted: seven :twisted: network are teaming up with ten for the rights. it was revealed that seven are actually taking ten to court because they 'claim' that ten and the other networks 'stole' the rights off them in 2001. a very interesting time ahead.

Not only that, but Seven are also taking the AFL to court.
I read on "The Age" website that the AFL are playing hardball with Channel 7 at the moment by stalling negotiations, stating;
".....that it is unwilling to deal with Seven while that network is suing the competition"

http://www.theage.com.au/realfooty/...deal-with-Seven/2005/03/21/1111253954127.html
 

Grantwhy

Juniors
Messages
1,285
Early feedback from the Nine network has indicated it will provide some form of challenge to the Seven-Ten bid, possibly through teaming with another media outlet.

Who? It couldn't be the ABC or SBS?

Could they be hinting at a Nine/Foxtel bid?
 

JW

Coach
Messages
12,657
http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,12634089-23211,00.html

----------------------

Nine rejects bidding war
March 23, 2005

NINE Network chief executive David Gyngell says he can't see his organisation joining an AFL bidding war.

The Seven and Ten networks last week decided to jointly bid against Nine for the control of AFL television rights for the 2007 to 2011 seasons, leaving Nine, which shares rights with Ten, in the lurch.

"I would be concerned if I was the AFL that they are now in a situation where it will be difficult to get a proper market going for the sale of their free-to-air rights," Gyngell told a Sydney newspaper.

"I don't know if we will participate. (The AFL) needs to try and tell me how we can, considering we are committed to covering rugby league matches on Friday nights in Sydney and Brisbane."

In the current deal, Ten broadcasts Friday night AFL matches that clash with Nine's coverage of NRL games.

AAP
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
JW said:
http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,12634089-23211,00.html

----------------------

Nine rejects bidding war
March 23, 2005

NINE Network chief executive David Gyngell says he can't see his organisation joining an AFL bidding war.

The Seven and Ten networks last week decided to jointly bid against Nine for the control of AFL television rights for the 2007 to 2011 seasons, leaving Nine, which shares rights with Ten, in the lurch.


Exactly,if nine decide not to bid against the others,it could come back to bite the AFL on the backside moneywise.

"I would be concerned if I was the AFL that they are now in a situation where it will be difficult to get a proper market going for the sale of their free-to-air rights," Gyngell told a Sydney newspaper.

"I don't know if we will participate. (The AFL) needs to try and tell me how we can, considering we are committed to covering rugby league matches on Friday nights in Sydney and Brisbane."

In the current deal, Ten broadcasts Friday night AFL matches that clash with Nine's coverage of NRL games.

AAP
 

S2H

Juniors
Messages
315
Seven are taking almost everyone to court over the loss of the AFL. Nine, Ten, Telstra, the AFL and the NRL #-o

I'm surprised orphans aren't being taken to court because they watched a game on 9.

Just wish league could get a decent FTA TV deal.
 
Messages
42,652
I can't see why Nine would bother.

AFL rates shit in NSW & Qld, it's only in Victoria that it'll rate for them. Adelaide and Perth aren't owned by Packer.
 
Messages
1,186
JW said:
http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,12634089-23211,00.html

----------------------

Nine rejects bidding war
March 23, 2005

NINE Network chief executive David Gyngell says he can't see his organisation joining an AFL bidding war.

The Seven and Ten networks last week decided to jointly bid against Nine for the control of AFL television rights for the 2007 to 2011 seasons, leaving Nine, which shares rights with Ten, in the lurch.

"I would be concerned if I was the AFL that they are now in a situation where it will be difficult to get a proper market going for the sale of their free-to-air rights," Gyngell told a Sydney newspaper.

"I don't know if we will participate. (The AFL) needs to try and tell me how we can, considering we are committed to covering rugby league matches on Friday nights in Sydney and Brisbane."

In the current deal, Ten broadcasts Friday night AFL matches that clash with Nine's coverage of NRL games.

AAP

This may be a good thing for us.

If nine doesn't bid for the AFL, seven and ten will get it for a steal. Seven have already said they are very interested in the NRL, in any form (meaning if they get the AFL they'll still want a shot at the NRL). This will keep our price up. Also, if nine keep the rights, they might show some/all FNF games in prime time nation-wide (or at least in melbourne).

Things may work out the opposite of people's fears.
 

Latest posts

Top