bluesbreaker
Bench
- Messages
- 4,195
And further, i'm not condoning this guy, nor looking for excuses... I've already publicly said I don't believe it to be the case, but it _is_ possible, and i'll bet this will be the defense he tries to use.
IanRitchie said:You really are an idiot.
If a Warriors player ever took to the cheap shot like that i'd never, ever forgive them, let alone condone it.
Lord Reynoldson said:Front-Rower said:You are one sick individual. Saying someone has the RIGHT to KING HIT another player whilst they are not looking because:
I have never said someone has the right to king hit someone, just that it was not the real Danny Williams that it did it. Danny did not conciously go after ONeill. He's not that stupid. ONeills the thug who knocked Danny's senses out of him. All I can sayb is sucked in to ONeill. He deserves what he got. He should not have been King Hit and no-one has the right to do it, but I have no complaint with it happening, especially as a result of his foul play.
innsaneink said:Sure wiped the smile off that little pricks face. As did last sat nite. :lol: :lol:
Lord Reynoldson said:The people to blame for ONeill's being knocked out are the officials for their total lack of control and Mark ONeill. The most important aspect of refereeing any sport is player safety, and there was absolutely nothing done by the officials throughout the game to prevent the Tigers from headslamming on a few occasions, and ngoing in with high shots or high swinging arms.
Mark ONeill brought it on himself with his pathetic excuse of a tackle that is somehow the same standard as the Adrian Morley tackle from Friday night. It is absolutely ridiculous. Morley's tackle was not a careless high tackle, and if it was, then ONeill's should be a grade 4 reckless high tackle. The judicary judge players on their reputations and Danny is known as being a tough player and they will wroingly make an example of him.
As far as I'm concerned, Danny Williams did not hit Mark ONeill. Yes, that may sound strange but to me it's true. I've seen Danny Williams play a heck of a lot, and after that shot put on him, the real Danny Williams was knocked out of him.
We have seen in the past what Williams will do if he's pissed off with someone. Against the Broncos a few years ago, some Broncos put on a cheap shot on Danny as the Broncos player got up to play the ball. Danny let the guy look at him and let him make sure he saw it coming. That's the kind of player Danny Williams is. No cheap shots from behind, he'll tell it to his face.
He's also the kind of guy that would have his say and argue his case. What I saw on Saturday night was a case of a high shot knocking the real Danny Williams out of Danny Williams. ONeill brought on what happened. Danny got up, played the ball, looking in a bit of a daze, reaches for the guy he thought had just tried knocking his head off and throws back what he was given. If Mark cant' take it, he should stop attacking a players head. Danny had barely said a word, and that is not like Danny Williams.
It was a case of someone with their senses knocked out of him doing what natural instincts tell him to do - protect himself by taking out those trying to get him.
The Real Danny Williams would NOT have played the ball, he would have gotten up throwing punches, not just one swing, he'd of looked him in the eye, dropped the ball and let the bastard see what was coming. He wouldn't have been able to keep quiet afterwards either, he'd have had plenty to say. That is what DANNY WILLIAMS would have done.
Instead, I saw someone knocked senseless who then proceeded to do what the referee's were fasiling to do - protect people's ssafety, throw a punch that Danny Williams would not have thrown without pulling the guy around to face him to see what was coming. Then, with barely a word spoken, so uncharacteristic of Danny Williams, he stood there while everything else went on, still in a daze from what had happened and then left the field without even a complaint or arguement. That is NOT Danny Williams. He'd of had plenty to say.
What transpired did so at the hands of a Mark ONeill cheap shot that knocked someones senses out and created a monster. ONeill deserves the suspension for striking himself and knocking himself out.
Taking circumstances into account, Danny Williams body may have hit Mark ONeill, but the mind that was Danny Williams was still laying on the ground as a result of Mark ONeill's foul play. For ONeill to have been branded this poor defenseless victim of the whole situation is absolutely pathetic.
No, someone should not be hit the way ONeill was, but Danny Williams was not himself when the incident occured.
He stated that he does not even remember the inncidient, and seeing the tackle quite a few times I can understand why that would be the case.
He should plead insanity/amnesia, whatever and get off without a suspension, because that was NOT Danny Williams in the mind an body that knocked ONeill out. That was a creation of ONeill's foul play. ONeill deserved what he got. For Danny to be found guilty of something that he didn't even conciously do due to concussion/whatever the case is a travesty of justice.
To suspend Danny is to suspend someone for being a victim of foul play that has knocked their senses out. That may have been Danny Williams body, but due to Mark ONeill it was not the mind of Danny Williams that conciously went after him. It would never happen again, unless someone else tries to put a high cheap shot on him. Why should he be punished as a result of another's conciously inability to play a game without attacking the head? Quite simply, he shouldnt.
LET DANNY WALK FREE! :evil:
Mark Rudd said:No more cowardly then the coward that gave him a forearm to the head in the first place.
Lord Reynoldson said:The people to blame for ONeill's being knocked out are the officials for their total lack of control and Mark ONeill. The most important aspect of refereeing any sport is player safety, and there was absolutely nothing done by the officials throughout the game to prevent the Tigers from headslamming on a few occasions, and ngoing in with high shots or high swinging arms.
Mark ONeill brought it on himself with his pathetic excuse of a tackle that is somehow the same standard as the Adrian Morley tackle from Friday night. It is absolutely ridiculous. Morley's tackle was not a careless high tackle, and if it was, then ONeill's should be a grade 4 reckless high tackle. The judicary judge players on their reputations and Danny is known as being a tough player and they will wroingly make an example of him.
As far as I'm concerned, Danny Williams did not hit Mark ONeill. Yes, that may sound strange but to me it's true. I've seen Danny Williams play a heck of a lot, and after that shot put on him, the real Danny Williams was knocked out of him.
We have seen in the past what Williams will do if he's pissed off with someone. Against the Broncos a few years ago, some Broncos put on a cheap shot on Danny as the Broncos player got up to play the ball. Danny let the guy look at him and let him make sure he saw it coming. That's the kind of player Danny Williams is. No cheap shots from behind, he'll tell it to his face.
He's also the kind of guy that would have his say and argue his case. What I saw on Saturday night was a case of a high shot knocking the real Danny Williams out of Danny Williams. ONeill brought on what happened. Danny got up, played the ball, looking in a bit of a daze, reaches for the guy he thought had just tried knocking his head off and throws back what he was given. If Mark cant' take it, he should stop attacking a players head. Danny had barely said a word, and that is not like Danny Williams.
It was a case of someone with their senses knocked out of him doing what natural instincts tell him to do - protect himself by taking out those trying to get him.
The Real Danny Williams would NOT have played the ball, he would have gotten up throwing punches, not just one swing, he'd of looked him in the eye, dropped the ball and let the bastard see what was coming. He wouldn't have been able to keep quiet afterwards either, he'd have had plenty to say. That is what DANNY WILLIAMS would have done.
Instead, I saw someone knocked senseless who then proceeded to do what the referee's were fasiling to do - protect people's ssafety, throw a punch that Danny Williams would not have thrown without pulling the guy around to face him to see what was coming. Then, with barely a word spoken, so uncharacteristic of Danny Williams, he stood there while everything else went on, still in a daze from what had happened and then left the field without even a complaint or arguement. That is NOT Danny Williams. He'd of had plenty to say.
What transpired did so at the hands of a Mark ONeill cheap shot that knocked someones senses out and created a monster. ONeill deserves the suspension for striking himself and knocking himself out.
Taking circumstances into account, Danny Williams body may have hit Mark ONeill, but the mind that was Danny Williams was still laying on the ground as a result of Mark ONeill's foul play. For ONeill to have been branded this poor defenseless victim of the whole situation is absolutely pathetic.
No, someone should not be hit the way ONeill was, but Danny Williams was not himself when the incident occured.
He stated that he does not even remember the inncidient, and seeing the tackle quite a few times I can understand why that would be the case.
He should plead insanity/amnesia, whatever and get off without a suspension, because that was NOT Danny Williams in the mind an body that knocked ONeill out. That was a creation of ONeill's foul play. ONeill deserved what he got. For Danny to be found guilty of something that he didn't even conciously do due to concussion/whatever the case is a travesty of justice.
To suspend Danny is to suspend someone for being a victim of foul play that has knocked their senses out. That may have been Danny Williams body, but due to Mark ONeill it was not the mind of Danny Williams that conciously went after him. It would never happen again, unless someone else tries to put a high cheap shot on him. Why should he be punished as a result of another's conciously inability to play a game without attacking the head? Quite simply, he shouldnt.
LET DANNY WALK FREE! :evil:
You're comparing a slap in the face to a king hit?! Meli's shot on Harrison was stupid, but it was just an open handed slap that was neither intended to injure or capable of injuring Harrison, it was an act of frustration, and while dumb was hardly malicious, which was reflected in the one week suspension that it incurred. Not in the same ballpark, hell, not even the same friggin' sport!RainMan said:IanRitchie said:You really are an idiot.
If a Warriors player ever took to the cheap shot like that i'd never, ever forgive them, let alone condone it.
Cough Cough, Frances Meli on Ashley Harrison...
Mark Rudd said:Biggest load of B.S I've ever read, impellitteri.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Pure gold.azza said:You melbourne supporters are a joke. There is no justification for what this idiot did and he deserves to be banned for the rest of the year. You just reflect poorly on yourselves with crap like this.
"was not himself"... fair dinkum. Give yourself a triple. I suppose we shouldn't been so hard on Hoppa because he thought he was a tapeworm?
chemicalbrother said:Hey f***wit, I said i condone it but you surely have joined the company of, Ray Hadley, Phil Gould and Beaussie as having your Arse transplanted on your face.
RHYTHM AND STEALTH said:Would Williams have done it to say
Betham
Tallis
Morley
Wiki
I doubt it
Cough Cough, Frances Meli on Ashley Harrison...
Hoggy said:RHYTHM AND STEALTH said:Would Williams have done it to say
Betham
Tallis
Morley
Wiki
I doubt it
After watching Williams for seven years...
Yes he would.