Frank Facer
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,069
Halves should have a side of the field that they defend on, but in attack, they should both be able to roam and interchange. I love it when a pair of halves plays together.
It genuinely worries me that every year, we advertise our game plans for all other clubs to look at before the start of the season...
Benny this is so true . We find it hard enough to win games never mind telling everyone how we are going to play .....It genuinely worries me that every year, we advertise our game plans for all other clubs to look at before the start of the season...
That was a play - 1 specific play that we executed with perfection, but it wasn’t our only play. The reason is worked so well was the threat of Ben Creagh out the front and Gasnier/Soward on the right. It was difficult to adapt instantaneously to that play when there was a lot happening elsewhere.Agree, but it's all about execution. It's one thing to know it's coming, but it's another thing to be able to stop it.
If you'll remember in 2009/10, our attacking plays were pretty much the same... Hornby to Soward, Soward to Boyd, Boyd to Cooper, or cut out Cooper to Morris. It was the same sweeping play every time, and every side knew that it was coming... But it was so hard to stop because it was executed well.
Hopefully that's where Hunt/Widdop will combine to improve the side, because if we learn to execute well, we'll be up there amongst the top 4.
So you're saying we are doomed benny?That was a play - 1 specific play that we executed with perfection, but it wasn’t our only play. The reason is worked so well was the threat of Ben Creagh out the front and Gasnier/Soward on the right. It was difficult to adapt instantaneously to that play when there was a lot happening elsewhere.
Different story when it’s a game plan, because the opposition game plan can be prepared to nullify. For example, last year we relied on forward power and offloads to score points, so the opposition figures out to compress the defence and stop the offloads would nullify the game - sure, we still came up with a few points but for the most part, that was the blueprint for winning.
Right now, there seems to be an obvious plan to beat us - compress defence, wrap up the forwards, rush Hunt whenever he’s at first receiver. That nullifies our Plan A and Plan B.
It genuinely worries me that every year, we advertise our game plans for all other clubs to look at before the start of the season...
Well obviously at first receiver he will be playing both sides of the field there's hope yet for MARY....We payed a lot of money for Hunt to guide our team around the park. He should be allowed to roam around where ever he likes to find weaknesses in the opponents defence.
Yes exactly and I'm sure the power game will be used much less by HUNT he likes to use his backline a lot hopefully if McDonald is out there he will certainly see more ball ....whether he uses it that's another question to be answeredAgree, but it's all about execution. It's one thing to know it's coming, but it's another thing to be able to stop it.
If you'll remember in 2009/10, our attacking plays were pretty much the same... Hornby to Soward, Soward to Boyd, Boyd to Cooper, or cut out Cooper to Morris. It was the same sweeping play every time, and every side knew that it was coming... But it was so hard to stop because it was executed well.
Hopefully that's where Hunt/Widdop will combine to improve the side, because if we learn to execute well, we'll be up there amongst the top 4.
I'm just pleased that Mary has articulated something that Hunt could understand.
Been saying that for months!So you're saying we are doomed benny?