I haven't read all the posts in this thread so this might have been brought up before. Sorry if it has.
Anyway the Wollongong Hawks NBL team is/was in a very similar position to us. Low crowds and low financial backing from sponsors (who would want to sponsor an NBL team in the gong?) meant they were going under for not being able to meet the $1mill NBL licence. Anyway news spread on radio and local news, the community started to pull through with the MASSIVE aid of players like Matt Campbell (pretty much led the fight to save the hawks). So they got the licence in 08.
09 and once again the club needed to ask for sponsors and people to buy memberships as they were once again not able to meet the $1 mill licence. Campbell once again rallied the community, got sponsors and in the end a big financial backer for a mine out the back of Dapto somewhere came in and has pledged to save the club. Now the money is there...but the NBL still hasn't assured the Hawks a licence. The club is now pretty much owned by the people as a result as well.
With Cronulla, until we get the development running or a big financial backer/private ownership. We will be forced to pretty much pay every year to just to see them in the NRL but unlike the Hawks, the club won't be run by the people but still the same board which hasn't done enough to save the club. Ricky is slowley assuming the Matt Campbell type role, but is he meeting business owners face to face and selling the sharks product? I doubt it, and I doubt anyone else at the club is as well.
A save the sharks movement is now really needed. But until we get significant financial help or the development actually goes ahead soon, it'll just be delaying the inevitable. I pray that we can survive until one of the top 2 options occur, otherwise it's almost certain to be lights out for the Cronulla Sutherland Sharks. The Wollongong Hawks even with the communty sponsors and membership drive were still below the quota in only the 2nd year of financial doom and would not even be applying for a licence had it not been for the backing by the mine owner who was "keen to get involved and help out the community more".
If the people save the club, shouldn't the people have the right to say how the club is run?