what?LOL:crazy:
:lol: Dumbass
what?
did you think clarke's performance was test standard?
do you think his recent offerings have been test standard?
he should've been rested.certainly because of injury but mostly due to poor form.
i definately wouldn't shut the gate on him but he needs some time out.
didn't hurt steve waugh.
you've just said he shouldn't be in the test team, but anyone who says he shouldn't is a joke.Shouldn't have played this test I don't doubt it but to suggest his spot in the team is in question is a joke.
you've just said he shouldn't be in the test team, but anyone who says he shouldn't is a joke.
do you actually read what you post?
they've read your dribble and feel at home.Why have all the geniuss all of a sudden started coming into the Cricket forum??? :crazy:
they've read your dribble and feel at home.
i don't hate him at all and think he's a long term test player(poss capt).with his recent form and injury he should've been rested.LOL @ the Clarke hate, he wasn't fit and shouldn't have played this test. But as soon as he has a few failures the Haters come out.
wtf?!that is so funny, last time I heard that I feel of my dinosaur... :crazy: