What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

AVFTH: Should Andrew Johns be stripped of his Immortal status?

Should Andrew Johns be stripped of his Immortal status?

  • Yes

    Votes: 28 23.3%
  • No

    Votes: 70 58.3%
  • Don't care, it's just a gimmick anyway

    Votes: 22 18.3%

  • Total voters
    120
  • Poll closed .
Messages
95
In light of an extraordinary career full of highs and lows, do you think Andrew Johns deserves to be a Rugby League Immortal? Should he be stripped of his Immortality?

Poll results and discussion in this thread will be aired on A View From The Hill this Saturday morning (11:00-12:00).

Season 12, Episode 12: 18 May, 2013
http://www.leagueunlimited.com/radio

As always, if you have any comments about the greatest game of all, send them to: radio@leagueunlimited.com
 

gUt

Coach
Messages
16,935
Yes, if anyone should be allowed to live forever it should be Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.
 

Lambretta

First Grade
Messages
8,689
For what reason?

Because he commentates for Channel 9?

I know that's a silly, silly, silly thing to get caught up in and his brother made a far better decision to get himself sacked and picked up by Foxtel, but stripping Andrew Johns of his immortality because he works for a Vossless company is over the top imo
 
Messages
33,280
I say no based this incident being non-rugby league and the fact I haven't kept up with the full story because horse racing is almost as irrelevant as it gets for me but I really wouldn't care if he did. The immortals is an outdated concept for one magazine anyway.
 

Lambretta

First Grade
Messages
8,689
I say no based this incident being non-rugby league and the fact I haven't kept up with the full story because horse racing is almost as irrelevant as it gets for me but I really wouldn't care if he did. The immortals is an outdated concept for one magazine anyway.

Oh it's the Joyous Gyp thing

Right. Errrr. Johns was drunkenly chatting with people at the horses.
Stories are embellished slightly.
Egos are bruised
Conclusions are jumped to
Fur flies
No one took a deep breath and calms the f**k down
Fingers are pointed
Excuses are made
Mole hills are made to look like Everest on steroids
Papers print endless reams of gash because there's nothing else happening of note (where is a Wayne Rooney type getting 15 year old grandmothers pregnant when you need one?)
Jumped up power hungry twots demand answers or threaten life bans from doing your dough at the races

Johns should be stripped of immortality status for caving to such a threat. He should have seen it as an opportunity to stop paying bookies money and told them all to get stuffed.

But he got on the pingers when he played - so he'll forver be an immortal in my eyes. But then so will Danny Wicks. I have a skewed view on life I admit.
 

POPEYE

Coach
Messages
11,397
Only if being an Immortal meant something to people other than those struggling for IQ points. Surely if being drug induced is not a deterrent to simple minded idolatry his other indicretions are only misdemeanors
 

gypsy

Bench
Messages
4,248
No. Immortal status is given solely for performance on the field.
What an idiotic thread/discussion point.
 

Charlie124

First Grade
Messages
8,509
He shouldnt have been considered in the first place so since he was inducted the whole concept has been cheapened forever.
 

gypsy

Bench
Messages
4,248
He shouldnt have been considered in the first place so since he was inducted the whole concept has been cheapened forever.

It's purely an on field award! How do some merkins have so much trouble with this concept...
 

Charlie124

First Grade
Messages
8,509
It's purely an on field award! How do some merkins have so much trouble with this concept...

Exactly, and he admitted to taking drugs his whole career, while playing....wait for it.....ON THE FIELD. Illegal drugs that would improve his mood and/or state of mind, allowing him to play better than he otherwise would have had he not taken them. They might not have been labeled "performance enhancing" or "steroids" but if they made him feel better and relax more or whatever it was that he got out of them then to me thats enhancing your performance.

He's a drug * and nothing more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jobdog

Live Update Team
Messages
25,696
Absolutely ridiculous question to ask.

The Immortals are based purely on on-field achievements. This had nothing to do with on-field achievements.

Why should something off-field change how we perceive someone's ability on it?
 

BennyV

Referee
Messages
24,016
The "Immortals" is a magazine promotion. Nothing more.

I agree. The fact that {insert favourite player} wasn't included is an outrage, he was the heart and soul of {insert favourite club/state} through their dominant years. How he wasn't chosen over {insert totally deserving yet subjectively illegitimate immortal} shows how much the selectors dont know about rugby league and cheapens the whole concept.
 

MSIH

Bench
Messages
3,807
Exactly, and he admitted to taking drugs his whole career, while playing....wait for it.....ON THE FIELD. Illegal drugs that would improve his mood and/or state of mind, allowing him to play better than he otherwise would have had he not taken them. They might not have been labeled "performance enhancing" or "steroids" but if they made him feel better and relax more or whatever it was that he got out of them then to me thats enhancing your performance.

He's a drug * and nothing more.

Judging by that logic, taking a panadol or drinking water is performance enhancing.
 

Rod

Bench
Messages
3,745
Exactly, and he admitted to taking drugs his whole career, while playing....wait for it.....ON THE FIELD. Illegal drugs that would improve his mood and/or state of mind, allowing him to play better than he otherwise would have had he not taken them. They might not have been labeled "performance enhancing" or "steroids" but if they made him feel better and relax more or whatever it was that he got out of them then to me thats enhancing your performance.

He said the few times he did it during the season it was after a game.

Pretty amazed this is even up for discussion TBH. Surely there are better issues in rugby league at the moment.
 

Latest posts

Top