Willow
Assistant Moderator
- Messages
- 110,051
Moffo: "I would have to agree with the issues about fees. But the banks are like any public company, they are return driven and focused on satisfying shareholders. If people have a problem with this, i think its more an issuing of revisiting social values in general, not just the operations of an individual bank."
I think it can't be understated that social values partly the reason why banks have become heartless bastards.
As El Duque says, banks are not a charity, but there was a time when they made more of an effort to help out the local community.
My RU playing father in law was also a divisional manager of one Midlands, one of the largest banks in Britain. He says that there was a time when he's main job was to provide finance for industry and families. He said it ws good to see jobs being created and people getting into their own home. Banks in Australia were the same.
But he ended up retiring early because his role changed to sacking his staff and forclosing on debts.... he said this was for the bottom line but it didnt make him feel any better to know that the shareholders were profiting from other people's misery.
That, and he also knew that he would eventually be made reduntant himself.
I'm lucky because I'm at that stage where the bank takes me seriously and I can use the system to my advantage but I know there's others who are charged pretty heavily for their meagre earnings when compared tosome who have so much more at their disposal.
Moffo is right, banks are 'return driven' but unfortunately, that means we have to sit by and watch the gap between rich and poor continue to grow at an accelerating rate.
I think it can't be understated that social values partly the reason why banks have become heartless bastards.
As El Duque says, banks are not a charity, but there was a time when they made more of an effort to help out the local community.
My RU playing father in law was also a divisional manager of one Midlands, one of the largest banks in Britain. He says that there was a time when he's main job was to provide finance for industry and families. He said it ws good to see jobs being created and people getting into their own home. Banks in Australia were the same.
But he ended up retiring early because his role changed to sacking his staff and forclosing on debts.... he said this was for the bottom line but it didnt make him feel any better to know that the shareholders were profiting from other people's misery.
That, and he also knew that he would eventually be made reduntant himself.
I'm lucky because I'm at that stage where the bank takes me seriously and I can use the system to my advantage but I know there's others who are charged pretty heavily for their meagre earnings when compared tosome who have so much more at their disposal.
Moffo is right, banks are 'return driven' but unfortunately, that means we have to sit by and watch the gap between rich and poor continue to grow at an accelerating rate.