What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

BankWest opening not live on 9

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,520
On the bright side at least we got Vossy instead of Rabs and Gus

Fox's coverage was brilliant. Glad it wasnt on Nine. Great build up live from the stadium, then the game in glorious HD with Vossy commentating and then NRL360 live from the stadium so we got the footage in background of all the fans on the pitch. Great job Fox League, the real home of RL!
 

8Ball

First Grade
Messages
5,132
The coverage was great on Fox, and the noise from the first try was amazing.
 

Stallion

First Grade
Messages
7,467
Fox's coverage was brilliant. Glad it wasnt on Nine. Great build up live from the stadium, then the game in glorious HD with Vossy commentating and then NRL360 live from the stadium so we got the footage in background of all the fans on the pitch. Great job Fox League, the real home of RL!

Missing a major point! Only 30% of the potential audience got to see it! Coverage was great but with a minimized audience ? Not so great?! Someone let the "secret " out please!
 
Messages
15,405
As a TV game, would people watch a 51-6 drubbing? Many neutrals would have turned off once it was obvious it was a blow out, as I dare say would many Tigers supporters.

TV coverage is for the game (i.e. what happens on field), not as an informercial for the stadium.

Fact is you pay for what you get. Channel 9 only pay for 1 game on Thursday night, 1 game on Friday night and 1 game on Sunday afternoon. They knew when the stadium was opening. They also would have had input with the NRL as to trying to get it scheduled for 4.00 pm on a Sunday. Nine never do the game any favours, even when they are contractually obliged to (e.g. not televising Finals games live when contractually obligated to do so).
 

Stallion

First Grade
Messages
7,467
As a TV game, would people watch a 51-6 drubbing? Many neutrals would have turned off once it was obvious it was a blow out, as I dare say would many Tigers supporters.

TV coverage is for the game (i.e. what happens on field), not as an informercial for the stadium.

Fact is you pay for what you get. Channel 9 only pay for 1 game on Thursday night, 1 game on Friday night and 1 game on Sunday afternoon. They knew when the stadium was opening. They also would have had input with the NRL as to trying to get it scheduled for 4.00 pm on a Sunday. Nine never do the game any favours, even when they are contractually obliged to (e.g. not televising Finals games live when contractually obligated to do so).

This game in particular was also an infomercial for a brand new stadium hosting two local clubs in front of a near capacity crowd. Pictures speak a thousand words. Public relations wise this would have been excellent on FTA tv. Instead we get 30% of potential tv audience. Not good enough.
 
Last edited:
Messages
15,405
This game in particular was also an infomercial for a brand new stadium hosting two local clubs in front of a near capacity crowd. Pictures speak a thousand words. Public relations wise this would have been excellent on FTA tv. Instead we get 30% of potential tv audience. Not good enough.

Oh yes I can see the promotion now - "Watch the game for the brand new stadium, watch the plastic seats, see the new scoreboard, watch the LED signage go on". Yes I'm sure the TV stations would have the viewers lining up for that :rolleyes:
 

Stallion

First Grade
Messages
7,467
Oh yes I can see the promotion now - "Watch the game for the brand new stadium, watch the plastic seats, see the new scoreboard, watch the LED signage go on". Yes I'm sure the TV stations would have the viewers lining up for that :rolleyes:

If you don't think someone watching that game on tv with a near full modern stadium is not a positive for the code then we will continue to disagree.
 
Last edited:

Generalzod

Immortal
Messages
33,848
It's the novelty value it will wear off...Basically I watch the game for the game not the location Henson Park will be a good place to watch Rugby League....
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,520
It's the novelty value it will wear off...Basically I watch the game for the game not the location Henson Park will be a good place to watch Rugby League....

I watch it for the game, the spectacle, the atmosphere, the event. Not many 50point drubbings Id bother sticking with but was fun watching the crowd erupt every try and the crowd noise making the game more enjoyable than the actual action on the pitch. Ive pretty much stopped watching ANZ games now due to the exact opposite of what we saw at Bankwest.
 

Generalzod

Immortal
Messages
33,848
I watch it for the game, the spectacle, the atmosphere, the event. Not many 50point drubbings Id bother sticking with but was fun watching the crowd erupt every try and the crowd noise making the game more enjoyable than the actual action on the pitch. Ive pretty much stopped watching ANZ games now due to the exact opposite of what we saw at Bankwest.
ANZ is awesome when it's full, I agree that a crowd less ANZ doesn't look good for the game, Suburban grounds need to be protected the Likes of Shark Park, Jubilee Oval, Win Stadium, Brookie, Ive been to all those grounds and the atmosphere is just as good.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,520
ANZ is awesome when it's full, I agree that a crowd less ANZ doesn't look good for the game, Suburban grounds need to be protected the Likes of Shark Park, Jubilee Oval, Win Stadium, Brookie, Ive been to all those grounds and the atmosphere is just as good.

Agreed atmosphere when full is great at these small grounds but they arent a great look for the game either. I was with a group of AFL mates and flicked the TV over to a game at Leichardt, they were staggered at how basic the stadium was and likened it to a WAFL level comp.
 

Generalzod

Immortal
Messages
33,848
Agreed atmosphere when full is great at these small grounds but they arent a great look for the game either. I was with a group of AFL mates and flicked the TV over to a game at Leichardt, they were staggered at how basic the stadium was and likened it to a WAFL level comp.
I understand I used to live 20 min walk to Shark Park when I was a kid I used to walk to Endeavour field and pay my $4 to watch the Sharks play people still hold on to those traditions and Rugby League is built on those traditions
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,520
Its also those traditions that are holding the game back. Whats that saying about doing the same things the same way for the same results?
 

Stallion

First Grade
Messages
7,467
Agreed atmosphere when full is great at these small grounds but they arent a great look for the game either. I was with a group of AFL mates and flicked the TV over to a game at Leichardt, they were staggered at how basic the stadium was and likened it to a WAFL level comp.

Conversely I know AFL people from Melbourne whom genuinely like and respect the NRL use of traditional home grounds. They say the localness and cultural value adds to the flavour and respect of the contest. Keeping in mind Sydney is very different to Melbourne landscape wise. This impacts on travel to and from grounds in all sorts of ways. Its a delicate and geographically challenging terrain in Sydney compared to Melbourne.
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
100,985
A very simple look at the schedule for this fortnight shows that Ch 9 already pick up an extra two games than usual - Good Friday and ANZAC Day afternoon games.

I don't think this is a big deal as some here are saying. If anything it could've detracted from the attendance given that it would be more easily accessible to people.

Also - the Easter Monday game has been exclusive to Fox for a number of years now.
 
Top