Razor said:Charlie never said "Lockyer is the current Australian captain", he said "they're not going to dump the Australian captain". The word current was not in there. Which means he is referring to him as the regular captain, not the current captain. Lockyer isn't the current captain of the Broncos, Webcke is(well not next week, but was last week), but Lockyer is the regular captain. Lockyer may be the current captain, but Johns is the regular captain, Lockyer is filling-in for Johns.
Razor said:Ah okay now I understand. Sorry Snoop. Didn't know you were still in primary school.
Razor said:Charlie never said "Lockyer is the current Australian captain", he said "they're not going to dump the Australian captain". The word current was not in there. Which means he is referring to him as the regular captain, not the current captain. Lockyer isn't the current captain of the Broncos, Webcke is(well not next week, but was last week), but Lockyer is the regular captain. Lockyer may be the current captain, but Johns is the regular captain, Lockyer is filling-in for Johns.
lockyno1 said:Lockyer is the captain Razor! Get your hands off Johns for 2 seconds and face the facts! Johns wants to go and play in a "rubbish" ESL Grand Final instead of the test! I do not care what you say but we can't have our " real captain" or whatever as you call it doing that! It is the ESL for goodness sake!
Lockyer has been filling in for Johns wait for it.....2 YEARS! That is not filling in that is replacing him mate. You don't drop the captain. Razor, if you want to know people's opinions about this create a new thread on this. Leave this one to the Barret-Lockyer debate, which I might add had some goo input until you stuck you nose in in and made it a Johns vs Locker debate!
Razor said:I didn't make it a Johns v Lockyer debate. Charlie said Lockyer is the captain. I corrected him.
Razor said:Lockyer has been captain for 18 months, not 2 years. And I asked Charlie before and he didn't answer. How long are you out for before you're replaced?
2 games? 4 games? 5 games? 10 game?
At what point was Johns replaced? There has to be a rule in place on the number of games, or the number of months, since you seem to sure on the rule. I want to know what number of games it is. And this is a serious question.
I didn't make it a Johns v Lockyer debate. Charlie said Lockyer is the captain. I corrected him. Then the Broncos fans came out in force and made it a Johns v Lockyer debate, not me. This thread turned into that by all the Broncos fans coming in saying Lockyer is the captain. There would have been 2 posts mentioning captaincy if they didn't come in. 1 by Charlie saying Lockyer was captain, me correcting him. That's it. But no, the Broncos fans had to start the debate.
Kiwi said:No wrong, you are the one who still sees Johns as the current Australian captain, which is wrong. A few games away injured, and sure he'd straight back in there. But 2 years, retiring from rep footy after origin next year, wanting to play ESL over a test = not worthy of being captain period. Lockyer is the Australian captain, get over it.
Snoop Shark said:If locky is injured id give it to Sutton.
He has showed more potential in 1 year then Barret has showed in his whole carrer
lockyno1 said:Too young. His time will come though!
Snoop Shark said:Not if his playing against Benji. That would be great to see IMO
Razor said:Benji isn't playing the Tests though. As soon as the Tigers season is over Benji is having surgery.