Red&BlackBear
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,137
Clarification here;Missed the CC Bears bid, or the alleged attempt to but the GC license, or the Pacific Bears bid rumour?
Central Coast Bears missed out because the NRL chose to not expand at all during that time.
Gold Coast was only heresy and behind the scenes chats. Nothing more.
Pasifika wasn’t a rumour as it was true however, the NRL advised the Bears to look west and not east.
The private models including Norths owned models were disbanded after the NRL found success and chose to go with government invested franchises instead. This model includes the NRL (ARLC) owning the franchises. This investment is also directly to the franchise like PNG or to pathways like Perth.
This meant all private bids were nuked. Dolphins were chosen prior to PNG and Perth due to sheer demand and the capital behind them. This includes continued cash flow through their owned commercial spaces and equity in their land ownership.
Neither CC, GC or Pasifika failed because NRL didn’t want Norths ownership involvement. That’s grossly inaccurate. Both CC and Pasifika were under 2 vastly different NRL administrators with vastly different game growth goals at the time of their respective bids. As stated before, GC was never a bid. It was chit chat between people.
