Bernard Sutton admits Roosters dudded thrice during Grand Final - according to Weidler

Discussion in 'NRL' started by ReddFelon, Nov 3, 2019.

  1. Valheru

    Valheru First Grade

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,802
    Likes Received:
    2,352
    As was the decision to call 6 again originally
     
  2. Raidersteve78!

    Raidersteve78! Juniors

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2019
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    4
    The decision to call six again was hardly a howler 50/50 at best, given that the ball bounced backwards it was only logical that it came of Teddy for that to have happened. I haven't seen the image that proves otherwise so I will take your word for it that it didn't touch him as none of the replays on the broadcast showed the angle that proves it didn't touch him.

    The decision to overturn the call was an absolute howler because it totally goes against the rules of the game.
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2019
    TheFrog likes this.
  3. carcharias

    carcharias Immortal

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    41,511
    Likes Received:
    9,622
    Ha
    Now he is whinging about the rules

    Hahaha
     
  4. firechild

    firechild First Grade

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    6,558
    Likes Received:
    631
    Don't disagree but you asked which incorrect decision went against the Faders and claimed there were none.
     
  5. Raidersteve78!

    Raidersteve78! Juniors

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2019
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    4
    Haha only an absolute moron can't see the issue with the rule as it stands. Trying considering what your view would be if it had come off the the Raiders trainer and had led to a try to the Raiders.
     
  6. carcharias

    carcharias Immortal

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    41,511
    Likes Received:
    9,622
    try considering the fact that you’re contradicting yourself.
    On one hand you want them to stick to the rules
    Then when they do you..want them to break the rules to advantage your team.

    dope.
     
  7. Raidersteve78!

    Raidersteve78! Juniors

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2019
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    4
    I don't want them to break the rules at all. I just want them to fix the outdated interference rule and police the trainer rules.

    Mistakes happen all the time but changing a call mid play is a breaking the rules as apposed to ruling one incorrectly.
     
  8. TheDalek079

    TheDalek079 Bench

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    4,219
    Likes Received:
    498
    Let it go dude
     
  9. carcharias

    carcharias Immortal

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    41,511
    Likes Received:
    9,622
    He didn’t change the call on trainer getting hit in the head mid play
    You wanted that rule broken to advantage your team.
     
  10. Raidersteve78!

    Raidersteve78! Juniors

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2019
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    4
    No I have only ever said that the trainer situation was ruled correctly. I have however said that the rule should be tweaked moving forward so that a team is not advantaged by the ball hitting their own trainer.
     
  11. carcharias

    carcharias Immortal

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    41,511
    Likes Received:
    9,622
    How many times have you seen it happen?
     
  12. Raidersteve78!

    Raidersteve78! Juniors

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2019
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    4
    Surely the fact it doesn't happen often isn't a reason not to fix it now that the fault in the rule has been identified.
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2019
  13. Raidersteve78!

    Raidersteve78! Juniors

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2019
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    4
    Would you be singing the same tune if by some freak coincidence it happened to the Roosters in the next few years and cost the Roosters the grand final (I'm not saying it cost the Raiders the game just like I haven't claimed the illegal change of call cost the Raiders the game).
     
  14. carcharias

    carcharias Immortal

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    41,511
    Likes Received:
    9,622
    I couldn’t give a flying f**k about the roosters.
    I was going for the raiders.

    I know the difference between not being good enough and being robbed though
     
  15. carcharias

    carcharias Immortal

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    41,511
    Likes Received:
    9,622
    So
    1 time?

    ...and they already had a rule for a bizarre accidental rebound off a non player.
     
  16. gerg

    gerg Juniors

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2009
    Messages:
    602
    Likes Received:
    402

    I think he's a Shire bogan not a Bondi toff? Which makes his trolling of you utterly ridiculous and your persistence engaging him even worse.
    Jog on dude.
     
  17. Canard

    Canard Referee

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2005
    Messages:
    21,799
    Likes Received:
    5,941
    Carch has demonstrated how much he doesn't care about the GF by posting 100 times in a week.
     
  18. Raidersteve78!

    Raidersteve78! Juniors

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2019
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ok I re-phrase then would you be singing the same tune if it happened to your team in the future because it wasn't fixed this off-season.

    And I have never said the Raiders were robbed. My argument was that it was a stretch for the Roosters to come out amd argue that they were dudded by the refs in the game. I have in fact said that the Raiders had their chances and couldn't get it done. They were however pretty unlucky in the game but that doesn't change the fact they couldn't get over the line.
     
  19. carcharias

    carcharias Immortal

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    41,511
    Likes Received:
    9,622
    really 100?

    f**k if true that’s shit
    I need to get a life ...
     
  20. carcharias

    carcharias Immortal

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    41,511
    Likes Received:
    9,622
    Ha ha ha
    They weren’t but they were?

    the raiders blew it.
    Just face it.
    They even had 10 minutes against 12 men.

    anyway
    You’re obviously a face painter or a sign holder.
    I’m out.
    Adios.
     

Share This Page