Tommy Smith
Referee
- Messages
- 21,344
The award is given to the best player in a given year. The player who has accomplished the most at all levels. So all that considered, how did Webcke and Lockyer get nominated and Willie not?
Willie was great for the Doggies all year. He was in the top 3 players in the Origin series. The best player in the finals series. And the Churchill medallist too.
Reading all the debate about Farrell being awarded the Golden Boot got me thinking of other candidates and the only ones i could think of were Willie and Hindmarsh but Mason was the clear stand-out (because of the finals series and Origin). If the award was given after the tri-nations he would have had more merit too because he was fantastic throughout for Australia.
So my vote would have gone to Big Willie. One of the top two forwards in the world.
Willie was great for the Doggies all year. He was in the top 3 players in the Origin series. The best player in the finals series. And the Churchill medallist too.
Reading all the debate about Farrell being awarded the Golden Boot got me thinking of other candidates and the only ones i could think of were Willie and Hindmarsh but Mason was the clear stand-out (because of the finals series and Origin). If the award was given after the tri-nations he would have had more merit too because he was fantastic throughout for Australia.
So my vote would have gone to Big Willie. One of the top two forwards in the world.