What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Biggest brand in NZ sports - NZ Herald article

Matua

First Grade
Messages
5,357
I'm more talking about the media. Compare the identities in both. Union takes itself very, very seriously. Union doesn't have Buzz, or Gordy Tallis, or any other meat heads like that.
Ah, I don't care about that stuff, in both sports I switch on the game at kick off and turn it off once it's done. I can't watch those types of shows anymore.

So, I'm not the best person to judge that. When I did watch those shows Buzz just seemed like the old guy at the pub just chatting away even when it mostly seemed bollocks. ;)
 
Messages
10,540
Ah, I don't care about that stuff, in both sports I switch on the game at kick off and turn it off once it's done. I can't watch those types of shows anymore.

So, I'm not the best person to judge that. When I did watch those shows Buzz just seemed like the old guy at the pub just chatting away even when it mostly seemed bollocks. ;)
Yeah I actually don't watch them either...but they all contribute to the hype around the game, along with podcasts, social media, news media etc.

I do enjoy the podcasts around player movement, discussion of incidents and all that, although now that I don't have a commute to work, I struggle to find the time.

One thing I do not have any time for is the match previews where some expert tells us who will win, like anyone has any bloody idea. Willie Mason said a few weeks ago that the Tigers were a good chance in Melbourne and they lost by 60.
 
Messages
10,540
Yeh i cant be bothered with pregame either for union and league. I dont even watch the halftime chat.
And in NZ, it's almost physically impossible to watch. It's too painful, our Warriors coverage. But yeah, it's all rubbish. Especially the player interviews at halftime, coaches etc, why they bother with that is beyond me.

Fox don't do bad in terms of pre-game but again yeah, it's pretty meaningless
 
Messages
2,863
Union presentation and production is far too sterile. The same old shit.

Sky NZ's league pre/half/post game coverage is cringe as f**k.

The common thread, is Sky.
 
Messages
1,286
Union presentation and production is far too sterile. The same old shit.

Sky NZ's league pre/half/post game coverage is cringe as f**k.

The common thread, is Sky.
And the lack of competition gives them no incentive to change either.

9 and Fox are constantly trying to one-up one another, so journos are always digging for scoops and rumours, tv producers are always trying to attract more eyeballs, and both camps are always sniping at each other.

Plus I think Aussies are generally just more comfortable with less-filtered opinion and confrontation than us typically more reserved Kiwis. I mean these very forums are a microcosm of that.

But it all adds up to - as many have described - pretty sterile coverage in NZ compared to Aus.
 

Manu Vatuvei

Coach
Messages
17,544
Have you been hanging out with Aussies too much? :) Rugby isn't dominated by private schools. State run boys schools dominate the comp, the best league school currently St Thomas is closer to being a private school than most winners of the Top 4.

I’ve seen you say this a few times (basically that there’s no Union/League class divide in NZ?) and I can only say it doesn’t match with my experience living in Auckland for 40 years, or my understanding of the history of the games here.

Union is obviously not a ‘posh’ game in NZ per se, it’s too widely popular for that - but league is certainly firmly working class and below in a way that Union isn’t and maybe no other sport is, really.
 

Latest posts

Top