Quicksilver
Bench
- Messages
- 4,365
The evidence supports the narrative, and it is the truth. You're arguing for arguments sake.
That’s the point. You just keep arguing it and the judiciary bends.
The evidence supports the narrative, and it is the truth. You're arguing for arguments sake.
Mal trying to say "It's not his go"
“It’s not in his character, he’s not that type of person to actually go out with intent and do things like that we’ll see what happens ....obviously his life felt threatened, he was choking so he felt that he needed to do something to get Shaun’s arm away to survive."
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/pr...diciary-after-shark-bite-20200816-p55m57.html
funny how so many people can watch the same incident and have so many different views of what actually happened
Which is why it was surprising that he was sent.funny how so many people can watch the same incident and have so many different views of what actually happened
Shouldn't have been a send off IMO. If Hetherington wasn't sent off in our game v Manly, no way Procter should have been. I know biting is a special category, but it just wasn't all that conclusive. As Gould said, Johnson's lack of reaction shows that if it was a bite, it was an extremely poor attempt at one.
That’s why the evidence of the referee and the bite marks at the time is crucial. If they were present at the time then he bit him. (Unless Johnson bit himself which we could work out from the video)
If the referee saw bite marks at the time then he did the right thing by sending him off.
That’s never been the case before, not sure why it would be now?That’s why the evidence of the referee and the bite marks at the time is crucial. If they were present at the time then he bit him. (Unless Johnson bit himself which we could work out from the video)
If the referee saw bite marks at the time then he did the right thing by sending him off.
That’s never been the case before, not sure why it would be now?
Shouldn't have been a send off IMO. If Hetherington wasn't sent off in our game v Manly, no way Procter should have been. I know biting is a special category, but it just wasn't all that conclusive. As Gould said, Johnson's lack of reaction shows that if it was a bite, it was an extremely poor attempt at one.
In these days of COVID-19, and the way we suspect the virus is transmitted, why would you be so stupid to put any part of your hand into another player's mouth?
I'm not condoning Proctor though. Biting has no place on the football field.