What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Brandon Smith

Valheru

Referee
Messages
20,472
Insider trading

Odds his mates got were higher than they should’ve been if for info was made public he’s starting
These are the same betting agencies that offer odds on results that they already know (reality TV) so we are supposed to feel sorry for them?

I will die on this hill, telling someone youre starting is as low level as it gets and is a basic part of their work that players should be able to share with friends and family.

Like he didn't promise the first try would be before 8 minutes and not make a tackle or something ridiculous like that.
 

Apey

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
29,817
I still don't think the betting thing is that bad. He told someone he is starting the game. So what?
Nah its enough to get him sacked on that alone and maybe even deregistered.

Might be on the minor end but he's told someone he's starting, and then has the knowledge a friend has placed a bet on him as FTS because of that information.

Anyone bothered to check if he tried any dummy half barge overs that game when it wasn't on? Lol.

I have no doubt other players are dumb enough to do the same but the difference here is he's been caught.
 

Valheru

Referee
Messages
20,472
Nah its enough to get him sacked on that alone and maybe even deregistered.

Might be on the minor end but he's told someone he's starting, and then has the knowledge a friend has placed a bet on him as FTS because of that information.

Anyone bothered to check if he tried any dummy half barge overs that game when it wasn't on? Lol.

I have no doubt other players are dumb enough to do the same but the difference here is he's been caught.
So what?

Who's the victim here? Sportsbet?

It doesn't appear he has done anything in the game to match fix or anything like that. Nor does it appear he has been paid for the information.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
45,273
These are the same betting agencies that offer odds on results that they already know (reality TV) so we are supposed to feel sorry for them?

I will die on this hill, telling someone youre starting is as low level as it gets and is a basic part of their work that players should be able to share with friends and family.

Like he didn't promise the first try would be before 8 minutes and not make a tackle or something ridiculous like that.
He knew they were betting on privileged info and found it funny

Honestly I’d deregister him

It was for his drug dealer mate not his family

What a way to blow up a good career

Storm and roosters knew did the right thing letting him go

Even if the bets were small
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
108,158
It's very low level.

Say a debutant or fringe first graders goes home and tells his family he is starting that week. Is that sharing insider knowledge?

Every week the media has "team tips" with conjecture or inside knowledge about changes happening.

There's a difference between "hey guess what I'm in this week, you should come down the game, f**k yeah!" And "hey go place this bet these odds are nuta cos I'm starting this week"

It's not about the agencies. f**k them. It's about player integrity
 

taste2taste

Bench
Messages
3,152
Who was the player that intentially knocked on and then gave away a penalty in front of the sticks ?

What ever penalty he got from the NRL Smith should get about a tenth as severe.
 

Vee

First Grade
Messages
5,847
He absolutely did obtain them and that is THE key plank in the prosecution of the Cheese- eg no supply without a recipient proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Incorrect. Attempt to Supply constitutes Supply under the Qld DMA, doesn't require an actual "supply" or obtain.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
45,273
Who was the player that intentially knocked on and then gave away a penalty in front of the sticks ?

What ever penalty he got from the NRL Smith should get about a tenth as severe.

This one too

This quotes nrl rules

“The NRL betting code states "no NRL employee, NRL club employee, player, player manager or game official is allowed to participate, or be directly or indirectly involved in any way, in gambling in relation to rugby league.“


“Or be involved directly or indirectly, in the provision of information not already in the public domain that might assist another person to gamble in relation to rugby league."
 

taste2taste

Bench
Messages
3,152
Im not convinced we have due cause to sack him and evidently neither is the club.

Especially if the case is chucked out or Smith is found not guilty.
Even if the Roosters can't sack Radley they can tell him to look for a new club ala May

It'll be interesting to see if Politis is true to his word about zero tolerance and sack one of thier favourite sons. It would certainly put a line in the sand for the other players and those who jion the club in the future.

The other guys on the golf trip are lucky they aren't been shown the door along with Rads.
 
Last edited:

soc123_au

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,616
I still don't think the betting thing is that bad. He told someone he is starting the game. So what?
Not often I agree with you, but here we are. His dealer didn't mention odds or betting until after the chat about him playing or not. He had a laugh when Scarface told him he had put down some cash. Dumb, yeah. We are talking the "Hectic Cheese" so nothing really to see here.
 

Chimp

Bench
Messages
3,247
And the integrity of the NRL, what little they have left cannot be further eroded.
If the NRL go after Smith on these betting texts, then they’d have to be doing a forensic examination of how the Panthers team when they rested 17 ‘leaked’, and heads would need to roll on that too, and then Smith would be well within his rights to ask that every 1-17 change is investigated, to ensure no other player ever shared that info with friends/family before it was public.
The fact is, the NRL are complicit in this - their rules allow clubs to name a starting 17 and just make changes right up until 1 hour before kick-off, long after the betting agencies (some of whom with which they partner and receive money from) have put up odds that can be materially impacted by the team changes.
If the NRL were serious, you name your 1-17 and that’s the team, bar injury, including the starting 13. We have players dropping out of the 17 and then playing reserve grade.
Punters will often bet on 1st try to then find their player has been moved to the bench - that’s not right either.
 
Messages
595
Its the Roosters way.

They need an enforcer. Collins alone isn't enough. Tino appears disgruntled at the Titans and is an obvious target. Dogs gunned hard for him too so rebasing to Sydney isn't out of the question.

Perth another contender but they are a billion miles away. Do they have a rail network over there yet or are they still on the horse and carriage?
What a stupid comment.

Evidently, you have never been anywhere near Perth.

PERTH RAIL NETWORK.jpeg
 

Latest posts

Top