I didn't have the best view, but wilson has always been a good defender and I think he still is a good defender despite your claims that he was poor defensively in this match.
I cannot argue on prince more. I have said all my crappy arguments a million times or more and I happily accept that people disagree with my view of him. I think he performs very well at half and has done so all year with a revolving door at 5/8, outside backs that are not yet near the quality of the top teams and a forward pack that gives less space then any side bar souths, manly and the warriors. I think he has a very good kicking game, a great short kicking game, a very good passing game, a good running game and good organisational skills that results in a consistantly performing backline. Of all things, the hardest thing to do at halfback is perform consistantly, and prince has done that this season. I now retire from the Prince opinion forum and surrender the last word to whoever wishes...
On Kerr, I think he is a good halfback that has yet to be tested. I don't think he deserves that opportunity at the tigers because I think Prince has done enough to retain his halfback position in the side. The bulldogs victory was won against a bulldogs pack lacking Price, Mason, O'melley and Ryan...thus the halves had more space then they would have had if they gone up against the bulldogs best side. They were a top 4 side without their best players.
going to be very difficult.
