If they had any sense at all they would change the name. Whenever they post on Facebook, news sites etc 90% of the comments are about how bad the name is. The Gold Coast bid changed their name, hopefully this mob do the same
Are the Bombers on a cash for comment plan? They are always named in articles like they ARE the only option.
Apart from the Brothers (which just sounds silly), what are the other options?
Given today's comments it's all mute, there is unlikely to be any new team anytime in the next 8 years! No wonder our great game is still a minor sporting blip on the world scene, can't even grow it in the country it is strongest.
Can only assume the amount of money that the AFL have pissed up a wall on the Giants and Suns with minimal return has made the NRL wary of expansion...
5K watching NRL in Perth doesn't do much to help either...
Given today's comments it's all mute, there is unlikely to be any new team anytime in the next 8 years! No wonder our great game is still a minor sporting blip on the world scene, can't even grow it in the country it is strongest.
As opposed to 6k in Canberra?
In case you missed the nrl's record nib crowd in Perth a couple of months ago........
How much would Perth actually cost the NRL per year ?
$15m ??
How much would Perth actually cost the NRL per year ?
$15m ??
Well given the grants to the clubs will raise to around $12 million with the new deal, that wouldn't be be terribly expensive.
Perth has been built up steadily over a number of years now in a fairly patient way and given their increasingly strong turn out to games that are given to them, you'd have to say they've proven themselves hungry enough for a side.
Looking at how much extra money the AFL puts into its Expansion teams in "hostile" areas as a guide, I would suggest they need more than an extra $3Million a year....
I would expect they would need in the vicinity of around $8-10Mil extra a year for promotion/marketing ( including cash for positive comment in the local media like the AFL does in Sydney), junior development and the like...
But heck, they have got the money to spend so why not do it?
Supposedly Smith commented on expansion that when they do the modelling in terms of costs it shows going from 17 is virtually the same as going to 18, so that's likely what they'd do.