BroncosNRL

[El Diablo]

So why were the Chargers included in the 98 season and the Crushers considered for merger with them?

I've never seen any evidence of this 'deal'.

they had to go as part of Brisbane's five year deal for no other team in SE Queensland

 

[Frank_Grimes]

they had to go as part of Brisbane's five year deal for no other team in SE Queensland

Got any evidence of that?

 

[El Diablo]

typical stupid question

 

[Frank_Grimes]

typical stupid question

That's a "no" for anyone who doesn't speak El Dumbo.

 

[El Diablo]

it's well known and has already been posted in this topic http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/posts/12158378/

idiot

 

[Frank_Grimes]

it's well known and has already been posted in this topic http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/posts/12158378/

idiot

Lol. A journalist mentioning it in an article without any references and footy fans claiming it here is evidence?

geniused by even your standards.

Try again.

 

[El Diablo]

what would satisfy you as evidence?

why would so many people know of it?"

eg http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/posts/2046840/

 

[no name]

the original gold coast team was based out of the tweeds

Derrr

 

[Nice Beaver]

Don't worry Beavs, your turn is coming next week. Thanks for the free home game btw

Seen our home and away record?

In hindsight it looks like a stroke of bloody genius!!

Looking forward to it.....

 

[muzby]

f**k. why did i open this thread again?

i just dropped 15 IQ points by reading the posts..

 

[Frank_Grimes]

what would satisfy you as evidence?

Probably actual EVIDENCE... if it's so well known then surely that would be easy to find rather than just anecdotes...

why would so many people know of it?"

eg http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/posts/2046840/

Should I put up some links to flat earth forums and wonder why you think the world is round despite so many people "knowing of it" being flat?

 

[El Diablo]

no evidence is good enough for you

you can't have been following the game for long if you don't know about it

 

[Frank_Grimes]

no evidence is good enough for you

you can't have been following the game for long if you don't know about it

Any evidence would do. But as suspected - you've got none. All you've got is anecdotes. I don't expect you to understand the difference between anecdotal evidence and real evidence though, so rest easy.

Again, if it's so well "known" it should also be well documented. But it's not.

 

[El Diablo]

documented where you f**kwit?

that a journalist wrote about it is proof it's widely known and existed

 

[Frank_Grimes]

documented where you f**kwit?

that a journalist wrote about it is proof it's widely known and existed

Lol. So NOW you've got complete and utter faith in in the media?

Please. Stop playing dumb.

 

[Pedge1971]

Lol. A journalist mentioning it in an article without any references and footy fans claiming it here is evidence?

geniused by even your standards.

Try again.

Broncos in cahoots with Qld Police are masters at sweeping evidence under the carpet.

But there have been so many scummy rumours coming out of that joint it cannot be coincedence. Where this smoke there is fire.

 

[Frank_Grimes]

Broncos in cahoots with Qld Police are masters at sweeping evidence under the carpet.

But there have been so many scummy rumours coming out of that joint it cannot be coincedence. Where this smoke there is fire.

Wonderful logic. I guess you're a flat-earther too.

 

[El Diablo]

Lol. So NOW you've got complete and utter faith in in the media?

Please. Stop playing dumb.

so you think that for some bizarre reason he plucked it out of his arse?

and what about other posters here that know of it? did they coincidentally pluck the exact same story from their arse too?

and you still haven't said what exactly is your definition of documented evidence

 

[blaza88z]

Wonderful logic. I guess you're a flat-earther too.

He's got an obsession, he needs mental help.

 

[Frank_Grimes]

so you think that for some bizarre reason he plucked it out of his arse?

and what about other posters here that know of it? did they coincidentally pluck the exact same story from their arse too?

and you still haven't said what exactly is your definition of documented evidence

Documented evidence is anything from an official on record. Anything. Any statement in writing or otherwise. But there's nothing. If it were so truthful you'd think it would be easy to find something and it would stand up to logic no? You talk about clauses and 5 year deals - why is there no record available?

I guarantee a lot of people believe it (including that journalist). Plenty of fabrications become "truth" through being repeated because they suit the narrative. Doesn't make them fact, and the test is whether they can be backed up with evidence.

I've never seen any evidence of it and I don't think anyone else has either. But your insistence that it's fact based on nothing other than a volume of people saying it is laughable. I'll happily concede the point if you can provide actual EVIDENCE. So far all you've provided is hearsay masquerading as fact.