That's like saying the Titans are part of the Brisbane market because Gold Coast borders Logan, which is part of the Brisbane metropolitan area.
Does Brisbane's metro population include Gold Coast??!
That's like saying the Titans are part of the Brisbane market because Gold Coast borders Logan, which is part of the Brisbane metropolitan area.
No.Does Brisbane's metro population include Gold Coast??!
Show don't tell.You backtrack after I linked NY times article saying they all part of same market. Then you said you were talking about something else. 20 million figure you always see for NY metro population is Newark - NYC - white plains number. Tri state is bigger & include pa & ct.
Actually it's another one of those ones where government agencies are increasing treating most of SEQ as a single metropolis. They've basically accepted that everything from Noosa down to the NSW border will be a single urban area within a generation, and as such have stated treating it as if it already is for purposes of planning.
Show don't tell.
Seriously show my original claim then show where you think I contradicted it. If you can do it without misrepresenting me I'll retract. Of course you can't do that because your whole argument is just a disingenuous semantics game where you're trying to conflate a metropolitan area with the limits of each city within said metropolis, and anybody that takes the time to google Newark will instantly see that you're full of shit.
BTW, the Tri-State area is just another name for the NY metropolitan area. They aren't two sperate things, NYC and the other cities in the area have just grown so big that they've all linked together into a single conurbation. It's the largest metropolitan area in the world. However none of that means that the individual cities have ceased existing as independent entities just because they've grown to meet each other and form one contiguous urban area.
Show don't tell.
Seriously show my original claim then show where you think I contradicted it. If you can do it without misrepresenting me I'll retract. Of course you can't do that because your whole argument is just a disingenuous semantics game where you're trying to conflate a metropolitan area with the limits of each city within said metropolis, and anybody that takes the time to google Newark will instantly see that you're full of shit.
BTW, the Tri-State area is just another name for the NY metropolitan area. They aren't two sperate things, NYC and the other cities in the area have just grown so big that they've all linked together into a single conurbation. It's the largest metropolitan area in the world. However none of that means that the individual cities have ceased existing as independent entities just because they've grown to meet each other and form one contiguous urban area.
Actually it's another one of those ones where government agencies are increasing treating most of SEQ as a single metropolis. They've basically accepted that everything from Noosa down to the NSW border will be a single urban area within a generation, and as such have stated treating it as if it already is for purposes of planning.
Considering that the most northern suburbs of the GC are only, what, 10 or so minutes from Logan, they basically already are a metro area in everything but name.
And just on those stats I ask people why don’t you want more Se qld nrl teams and that’s without population growthFor population statistics Brisbane, GC and SC are all separate. Brisbane has 2.3 million, GC about 600k and SC 300k
There's metro statistic area which is continuous sprawl & then combined area which is incorporates part of ct & pa.
Anybody looking at map will see new York teams giant, jets, red bulls all playing on that side of river like devils..
thats unrealistic in the modern day. Media money makes up about 50% of a clubs revenue.Although the subject is very interesting, these threads are such a punish to read. Until clubs can thrive without being propped up by media money the game cannot grow.
Hence why 9 and fox will always have a stranglehold on the NRL then.thats unrealistic in the modern day. Media money makes up about 50% of a clubs revenue.
well not necessarily. AFL just had three serious bidders for their rights. The days of Fox being the only option are coming to an end.Hence why 9 and fox will always have a stranglehold on the NRL then.
I don't think we can brake free from that media dictatorship, until this sport becomes expanded moreso... 20 teams all around aus/pacific, 10 matches a week, in all major cities/states in aus... once that becomes a reality, RL will dictate to the media and which one they'll accept.. hell they could even drop the rounds down to 20 a year... NFL has half the amount. ....till then 9&Fox are bankrolling and newsltd says jump.. either way bills are getting paid.. and the comp is the comp.. till proper clubs from lower grades raise their hands to commit to be licensed under the NRLs thumb... have to get real folks, there will never be a culling/merger ever again... and areas that aren't playing the sport at elite levels aren't getting looked at period...well not necessarily. AFL just had three serious bidders for their rights. The days of Fox being the only option are coming to an end.
Also they dont get dictated to by TV half as much as us despite getting more money. I suspect the problem lies with us, not with the tv companies!
I don't think we can brake free from that media dictatorship, until this sport becomes expanded moreso... 20 teams all around aus/pacific, 10 matches a week, in all major cities/states in aus... once that becomes a reality, RL will dictate to the media and which one they'll accept.. hell they could even drop the rounds down to 20 a year... NFL has half the amount. ....till then 9&Fox are bankrolling and newsltd says jump.. either way bills are getting paid.. and the comp is the comp.. till proper clubs from lower grades raise their hands to commit to be licensed under the NRLs thumb... have to get real folks, there will never be a culling/merger ever again... and areas that aren't playing the sport at elite levels aren't getting looked at period...
Grow up, these two chnnels feed off the league, channel seven and ten wouldn't even know what to do with league, and stan is rudderless... what they got... bali 2001?Yes and no though. Just because it is with Fox and Nine now doesn’t mean that it is a fait accompli. Put yourself out to tender
Tbf both ten and seven did well with the league when they had itGrow up, these two chnnels feed off the league, channel seven and ten wouldn't even know what to do with league, and stan is rudderless... what they got... bali 2001?
Grow up, these two chnnels feed off the league, channel seven and ten wouldn't even know what to do with league, and stan is rudderless... what they got... bali 2001?
Yeah, but i don't care, im not the type to look over the fence and ponder at another businesses broadcast rights... the league should have been kaput the way it was inflated and run, before the arlc took over before/during covid... yet we all seem fit to be judge and jury, come out 1st off the block and break records to be the more relevant sporting code. The NRL will top that deal in a few years, then AFL will again pull our pants down, its almost like theyve setup a Kabal gill and peter sitting in a russian bathhouse smoking cigars, laughing at union and aleague plotting at maneuvering broadcasters with content... they seem too chummy those two... makes sence since petes always digs on gill here and there.. thats the sort of stuff politians do to make it look like its an us vs them, but really it both us using youDid you not just see what fumbleball did? Do you understand anything about power dynamics?