I guess IF the Central Coast was shot down and the ARLC came out saying a Bears franchise would add to the value however, Brisbane wouldn't be far fetched. Geez even Central Queensland would be ideal to an extent. QLDers have had a soft spot for the Bears, mainly due to the 90's with Larson, Moorw, Ikin and Dallas. North Brisbane Bears wouldn't be bad, could still call them Norths haha.
But Central Coast is where the foundation work has been laid and we want to keep growing the brand in the area. We built a stadium, isn't much to ask that we actually play on it is it?
No doubt Brisbane would be better financially then Perth or Central Queensland. Even New Zealand.
That said I want to see a Central Coast side. The NRL need to pull their finger out and tell the Bears unequivocally whether or not there will be a Central Coast side anytime within the next 10-20 years.
If their answer is 'No, but we're expanding elsewhere' then yes the Bears should look to Brisbane or New Zealand to keep their brand alive and help revive interest in North Sydney and the NRL needs to be taking a proactive role in ensuring that.
Hell... a Bears side based in Brisbane would be strong for the game. Hell, you could even tee it up so that they still play the North Sydney Oval game against Manly. Potentially you could even get Rabbitohs, Tigers, Roosters, Manly and Knights to give up 1 home game and play the Bears away at Gosford to keep a 5 game Bears Gosford package.
Anything like that is better than losing the Bears brand and losing North Sydney for good.