Chambers' crusher tackle

[Twizzle]

Proves nothing. With the incompetence of the judiciary, the smart option was taking the early guilty plea.

to you maybe, but good luck fighting that battle on your own

 

[Bazal]

to you maybe, but good luck fighting that battle on your own

I get the feeling he does an awful lot of things on his own...

 

[JJ]

Disgraceful tackle - seems he did it >1 in the game - looks more like something Jake the Snake Roberts used to pull out - a variant of the DDT


Chambers is a f**king grub

 

[JJ]

Ahh, there you go, I wasn't aware of the reverse DDT - clearly it's been integrated into Storm training, just a matter of time before we see a DDT too

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

Proves nothing. With the incompetence of the judiciary, the smart option was taking the early guilty plea.

The fact he took an early guilty plea and 3 weeks in an unwinnable case to avoid 5 weeks proves nothing?

What filing cabinet have you been smoking?

 

[Russell Coight]

Proves nothing. With the incompetence of the judiciary, the smart option was taking the early guilty plea.

You must be smoking some good shit. Chambers is lucky he didn't break his neck.

 

[Bazal]

He fact he took an early guilty plea and 3 weeks in an unwinnable case to avoid 5 weeks proves nothing?

What filing cabinet have you been smoking?

Imagine if the players were reversed. Dumb f**k would be calling for a life ban.

3 weeks is light for that tackle and Chambers should be happy he got away with it as well as he has

 

[Tommy Smith]

3 weeks is a gift.

Should have been closer to 13.

He could easily have done serious, yet easily avoidable, damage to Hayne's neck/spine.

How is that only worth 3 weeks especially when you have priors?

We can all cop high tackles because it happens. Even spear tackles are often well intentioned tackles that go wrong.

But what Chamberpot did was malicious and intentional. If ever you were gonna throw the book at a player, this was the moment.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

Imagine if the players were reversed. Dumb f**k would be calling for a life ban.

3 weeks is light for that tackle and Chambers should be happy he got away with it as well as he has

Much outrage. So few f**ks given. (Assuming he wasn't injured, not wanting to see any player injured like that)

 

[Generalzod]

The fact he took an early guilty plea and 3 weeks in an unwinnable case to avoid 5 weeks proves nothing?

What filing cabinet have you been smoking?

Melbourne Storm and filing cabinets..lol

 

[The Rosco]

Proves nothing. With the incompetence of the judiciary, the smart option was taking the early guilty plea.

So he admitted his guilt, but you still see it that he isn't guilty.
You must've gone the same high school as my Mrs.

 

[jargan83]

You’d never see Latrell Mitchell involved with a such a grub act.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

So he admitted his guilt, but you still see it that he isn't guilty.
You must've gone the same high school as my Mrs.

Did she do a crusher tackle on you as well?

 

[Bazal]

You’d never see Latrell Mitchell involved with a such a grub act.

Latrell is too busy giving merkins the big don't argue to be a dirty bloke...on comparison, you can see why Chambers feels the need to thug it up.

 

[The_Shield]

So he admitted his guilt, but you still see it that he isn't guilty.
You must've gone the same high school as my Mrs.

We all know that the judiciary is incompetent. There’s no sure things there even if you have proof that proves you innocent, which I believe there is enough in this case, the idiots on the judiciary could still just go “nope, guilty” and he’ll be gone for the rest of the year. Why risk that when you can just choose the early guilty plea and come back in the finals

 

[AJB1102]

We all know that the judiciary is incompetent. There’s no sure things there even if you have proof that proves you innocent, which I believe there is enough in this case, the idiots on the judiciary could still just go “nope, guilty” and he’ll be gone for the rest of the year. Why risk that when you can just choose the early guilty plea and come back in the finals

Take out the bullshit technicalities around if it was a textbook "crusher" tackle or not, do you believe it was dangerous and reckless from Chambers? Or are you arguing its sweet, play on?

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

We all know that the judiciary is incompetent. There’s no sure things there even if you have proof that proves you innocent, which I believe there is enough in this case, the idiots on the judiciary could still just go “nope, guilty” and he’ll be gone for the rest of the year. Why risk that when you can just choose the early guilty plea and come back in the finals

So if Latrell Mitchell did it to Cameron Smith, that'll be ok?

 

[The_Shield]

Take out the bullshit technicalities around if it was a textbook "crusher" tackle or not, do you believe it was dangerous and reckless from Chambers? Or are you arguing its sweet, play on?

I think this tackle looked worse then it actually was. He doesn’t come down on the head, in fact he moves to make sure he doesn’t.

So if Latrell Mitchell did it to Cameron Smith, that'll be ok?

Yes. I know your not gunna believe me when I say that but who cares

 

[AJB1102]

I think this tackle looked worse then it actually was. He doesn’t come down on the head, in fact he moves to make sure he doesn’t.

Unnecessarily dangerous though. What the f**k was the design behind the jump before dropping his weight on Hayne other than to hurt him? Just because he didn't seriously injure Hayne doesn't make it ok.

Chambers gets no credit for moving to make sure he didn't land directly on the back of the neck for 2 reasons; necks can still break being crunched from the side and because if Will doesn't jump & drop onto Jarryd there is no dangerous contact to avoid.

 

[Pedge1971]

to you maybe, but good luck fighting that battle on your own

He has @McLovin lol.....