Club Greats Form New Parramatta Alliance

[Gronk]

Since when is someone's side of a story automatically not the truth? FMD

If there has been an out of court settlement, then the truth exists. It's not about sides of the story. It's about the facts and he should share that info.

 

[mickdo]

That was a report? I thought it was an opinion piece.

Somebody wrote it, so it's obviously somebody's opinion ;-)

 

[Jodeci]

Since when is someone's side of a story automatically not the truth? FMD

But but but if the previous chairman sent out the report, then it's ok and 100% true and everything is fine...

 

[mickdo]

If there has been an out of court settlement, then the truth exists. It's not about sides of the story. It's about the facts and he should share that info.

If there's been an out of court settlement then most likely it has confidentiality clauses on both sides ffs! :crazy:

 

[mickdo]

But but but if the previous chairman sent out the report, then it's ok and 100% true and everything is fine...

Naturally

The opinion of an administration is always what you will get in any report they publish (unless it was done by an independent body of course, but then if the admin doesn't like it it usually never gets published anyway :lol. It's the same for every organisation, whether it be government, or Qantas or whoever. Ridiculous to think otherwise.

 

[SDM]

Somebody wrote it, so it's obviously somebody's opinion ;-)

I would put it in the non-fiction section, with a note "based on a true story"

 

[mickdo]

I would put it in the non-fiction section, with a note "based on a true story"

As you're perfectly entitled to do. Always get both sides of any story if you can. And two different News Ltd publications don't count ;-)

 

[Gronk]

If there's been an out of court settlement then most likely it has confidentiality clauses on both sides ffs! :crazy:

Well then not everything has remained confidential has it ? Seems to be one rule for some and another for others.

 

[mickdo]

Well then not everything has remained confidential has it ? Seems to be one rule for some and another for others.

Maybe the parts that have been released weren't covered by the confidentiality agreement? :sarcasm:

 

[ParraAds]

But but but if the previous chairman sent out the report, then it's ok and 100% true and everything is fine...

Yes it's just one big smear campaign against the current board... everyone hates the current board the poor little things. :roll:

 

[HevyDevy]

Meaning that you expect the Chairman of our club not to tell the truth ? That's odd TBH.

Unfortunately he doesn't have a great record when it comes to telling the truth.

 

[born an eel]

But but but if the previous chairman sent out the report, then it's ok and 100% true and everything is fine...

I don't recall Ovo every trashing peoples character, I don't think he has it in him, especially using half truths and innuendo to attack their integrity.

 

[Freak2]

I just love this forum

For months just about everyone was whinging about how we dont get the facts on the sackings, etc

The club sends out a 10 page or so document outlining just about everything and now you say it didn't have to go out.

That will do me...

Great to see Kolc looking for revenge.

By suggesting it didn't have to go out I was referring to the fact that it was a non compulsary mail out to members.

From a non biased opinion on the report I would suggest that it should never have been circulated, however given that this is now history it will be interesting to see how certain individuals adhere to the statements made.

What happens now if Spags and Mr Kolc have to work together for the betterment of the club?? I certainly don't hold faith that such allegations can be swept under the carpet and they can work together to improve this place.

As much as we all don't want our club to be a political environment there is simply no getting around the fact that peoples varied opinions on ANYTHING & EVERYTHING will ensure politics will always play a role.

 

[Jodeci]

I don't recall Ovo every trashing peoples character, I don't think he has it in him, especially using half truths and innuendo to attack their integrity.

You know as well as anybody that Ovo didn't and wouldn't ever do a thing.

We all know Fitzy pulled the strings and ran every department from day 1

 

[Jodeci]

By suggesting it didn't have to go out I was referring to the fact that it was a non compulsary mail out to members.

From a non biased opinion on the report I would suggest that it should never have been circulated, however given that this is now history it will be interesting to see how certain individuals adhere to the statements made.

What happens now if Spags and Mr Kolc have to work together for the betterment of the club?? I certainly don't hold faith that such allegations can be swept under the carpet and they can work together to improve this place.

As much as we all don't want our club to be a political environment there is simply no getting around the fact that peoples varied opinions on ANYTHING & EVERYTHING will ensure politics will always play a role.

This is a general comment.

Why haven't the people mentioned in the document taken action against THE LETTER that was sent out?

So Hilly was paid his entitlements 12 months ago, he didn't sue the club for any actions, he gets named and shamed in the document and never pressed against taken that document that the CLUB sent out to court.

So if he doesn't have a problem with the document, then is there NO issue.

It's funny how we all wanna know what's going on in the board room, we hear all the whispers and rumours, we wanna feel part of the club in some capacity to thrive on being told some "inside' info, we want reasons for all the sackings and pay out info.

The club releases a document outlining all those details and we have people hear who say "Off course it's one sided, etc. Typical of them (the board) to release info that helps them, etc.

No one will ever be pleased...

 

[SDM]

Before I got the report, I didn't really have an opinion, after I read it I thought the chairman was a jerkoff who thought he could play the members for fools, i.e. Fitzy the 2nd.
I voted for change, not same sh*t different smell.

 

[Freak2]

This is a general comment.

Why haven't the people mentioned in the document taken action against THE LETTER that was sent out?

So Hilly was paid his entitlements 12 months ago, he didn't sue the club for any actions, he gets named and shamed in the document and never pressed against taken that document that the CLUB sent out to court.

So if he doesn't have a problem with the document, then is there NO issue.

It's funny how we all wanna know what's going on in the board room, we hear all the whispers and rumours, we wanna feel part of the club in some capacity to thrive on being told some "inside' info, we want reasons for all the sackings and pay out info.

The club releases a document outlining all those details and we have people hear who say "Off course it's one sided, etc. Typical of them (the board) to release info that helps them, etc.

No one will ever be pleased...

Totally agree mate - they are in a position currently where they are damned if they do, damned if they don't and for this reason my opinion is the report should not have gone out. SDM sums it up perfectly, he now has an opinion....:crazy:

 

[Jodeci]

Unfortunately he doesn't have a great record when it comes to telling the truth.

So Spags said that Ando had the full support from the board.

A few weeks after that after a few more poor performances, a few board members have a meeting and conclude that we need to move on from the current coach and sign a new one.

How did he not tell the truth?

We dont need to go over this anyway, it's happened and there is no point.

Just to add, Jerry Jones (Owner & General Manager) of the Dallas Cowboys came out a few weeks back and promised that Wade Phillips the coach of the Cowboys has his full support that Wade Phillips will carry out his contract and coach the Cowboys after being 1 and 7.

Jones sacked him and brought in Jason Garrett and the Cowboys are 1 and 1 and the game they lost was a score with 3 mins left in the game against the Saints.

 

[Jodeci]

Totally agree mate - they are in a position currently where they are damned if they do, damned if they don't and for this reason my opinion is the report should not have gone out. SDM sums it up perfectly, he now has an opinion....:crazy:

Totally agree also

It's getting annoying when the puppets keep dishing up the same crap over and over again.

 

[SDM]

So Jerry Jones is not a man of his word either?