What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

News Coronavirus and NRL

Frailty

First Grade
Messages
9,454
I live in Melbourne. Your ad hom is not only wrong but arrogantly wrong.

The first press coverage was Laidley arrested for stalking, then about the leaking of the pictures followed in the next day or so, with the following week all articles (the Age and Herald Sun) about how AFL coaches and players wanted to reach out and check on his mental health, and about how he was "the victim".

The tone and content of these articles is very sympathetic, and full of messages of support and offers of assistance:

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl...-reveals-cultural-change-20200509-p54rf3.html

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/de...g/news-story/ea48bfa3ab4db8ac3761ef7c1fbcc3f7

https://7news.com.au/sport/afl/vict...obe-into-dean-laidley-photo-scandal-c-1023417

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/me...ley-in-a-bad-place-says-lawyer-ng-b881545485z

Compare this to the coverage given to Latrell Mitchell and Josh Ado-Carr.

Let's look at a couple of issues here:
  • The source of the photographs that came out. LM and JAC posted their own photos publicly, whilst the Laidley photographs were a breach of Victoria Police. That's a significant issue that rightly gets coverage.
  • One is criminal case which has significant limits on which journalists can report without effecting the case should it go to trial. The other is a breach of restrictions that is not criminal and is a fine.
  • One is an older white man, and the others a young indigenous men. The fact is this - as much as we like think we've progressed beyond treating people differently based on race, the proof is in the pudding. The media attacks on Latrell have been beyond disgraceful.
  • No article has identified Laidley as the the victim at all. They have definitely taken a more in-depth look at Laidley's fall from grace but I suggest this should be the case when the circumstances are so unusual.
There is no cover up. To suggest this is ridiculous. Rather it is an absolute poor standard of journalism from those who cover Rugby League.
 

Desert Qlder

First Grade
Messages
9,386
I live in Melbourne. Your ad hom is not only wrong but arrogantly wrong.

The first press coverage was Laidley arrested for stalking, then about the leaking of the pictures followed in the next day or so, with the following week all articles (the Age and Herald Sun) about how AFL coaches and players wanted to reach out and check on his mental health, and about how he was "the victim".

The tone and content of these articles is very sympathetic, and full of messages of support and offers of assistance:

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl...-reveals-cultural-change-20200509-p54rf3.html

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/de...g/news-story/ea48bfa3ab4db8ac3761ef7c1fbcc3f7

https://7news.com.au/sport/afl/vict...obe-into-dean-laidley-photo-scandal-c-1023417

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/me...ley-in-a-bad-place-says-lawyer-ng-b881545485z

Compare this to the coverage given to Latrell Mitchell and Josh Ado-Carr.

You forget he's the only bloke who's ever lived in Melbourne.
 

Desert Qlder

First Grade
Messages
9,386
Let's look at a couple of issues here:
  • The source of the photographs that came out. LM and JAC posted their own photos publicly, whilst the Laidley photographs were a breach of Victoria Police. That's a significant issue that rightly gets coverage.
  • One is criminal case which has significant limits on which journalists can report without effecting the case should it go to trial. The other is a breach of restrictions that is not criminal and is a fine.
  • One is an older white man, and the others a young indigenous men. The fact is this - as much as we like think we've progressed beyond treating people differently based on race, the proof is in the pudding. The media attacks on Latrell have been beyond disgraceful.
  • No article has identified Laidley as the the victim at all. They have definitely taken a more in-depth look at Laidley's fall from grace but I suggest this should be the case when the circumstances are so unusual.
There is no cover up. To suggest this is ridiculous. Rather it is an absolute poor standard of journalism from those who cover Rugby League.

Media bias is completely embedded into coverage of the two sports. Reasons for this are cultural, political, economic and geographic in nature.

At times this bias can take the form of a more 'compassionate' approach to criminals in the favoured sport, as what has occured here.

Any attempt to deny that this bias exists is what is truly worthy of ridicule.
 

unforgiven

Bench
Messages
3,138
This article seems like pure conjecture to me, but if the numbers are correct the NRL has a lot of work to do to make its business viable. The $1.9b represents Fox's current $200m for 8 years as well as Nine's $90 or $100m over three years, and so is quite misleading.

Vlandys accepting a reduced amount this year seems feasible, with several rounds lost, but I can't imagine him doing the same for 2021 and 2022.
It's a ch9 article so I wouldn't say it is conjecture, just reporting their point of view.
 

TheFrog

Coach
Messages
14,300
as much as we like think we've progressed beyond treating people differently based on race, the proof is in the pudding. The media attacks on Latrell have been beyond disgraceful.
So I guess Nathan Cleary must be black too.
 
Last edited:

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,549
the narrative is that rugby league players are scumbags, criminals that should be monitored at all times. AFL players are heroic and brave and if they go off the rails then its underlying mental health problems or a "society wide problem" that caused it. It's blatant discrimination in a way.

youre kidding right? How many times has the mental health card been played by all sports stars including nrl players last few years? You can Go back to 2016 and Barba and the Thai rehab stint, and probably before that. Sure media beats up on rugby league but rather than blame afl for an easy ride maybe we need to take a good long hard look at ourselves and or inability to manage the media better and have a more positive relationship?
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,549
Supercars, you actually consider watching cars go around and around the same track time after time after time more enjoyable to watch. Really I can't fathom that rationale, each to their own.

motorsport is like cricket, good to have on in the background or when working in the garage. It’s actually a great thing to attend and is a full on sensory overload, if you've never been to a F1 event Id highly recommend it.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,549
Nine Entertainment Co is close to agreeing to a revised three-year deal with the NRL as the code prepares to announce a broadcast contract worth up to $1.9 billion. After weeks of negotiations, during which Nine threatened to walk away from the sport, the free-to-air network is now on the verge of recommitting to the NRL for the rest of the current broadcast cycle, which ends in 2022.

A series of meetings on Tuesday afternoon culminated in Nine earning a discount from the NRL of around $50-$70 million over the next three years. An extension remains unlikely but not impossible before the NRL announces the deal. It comes as Foxtel, which is desperate to extend its tenure as the game’s pay-TV provider, moves towards finalising a deal worth about $200m a year, potentially until 2027. ARL Commission chairman Peter V’landys and interim chief executive Andrew Abdo have been working around the clock to strike a deal with the game’s television partners in a coronavirus-impacted market. The new deal will be a major boost for NRL clubs and players, who are largely funded by the sport’s broadcast revenue.

The deal, which was the final hurdle in V’landys’ push for a May 28 competition restart, will allow the NRL to finalise a draw as early as the end of this week. Nine, the publisher of this masthead, had the best part of three seasons remaining on its deal with the NRL but the COVID-19 crisis has allowed the broadcaster to renegotiate the value of the arrangement.

Sources with knowledge of the negotiations say Nine’s revised deal could represent a saving of up to 20 per cent on what it was originally due to pay in the final three years of the deal. Based on that discount, Nine will pay about $85-$90m in 2020, a discount of up to $30m. It will pay in the vicinity of $90-$100m in the final two years. The deal is a win for Nine and the NRL, as it leaves its options open for more financially viable free-to-air networks to bid for the rights in the future. Both Nine, which had been willing to walk away from the sport, and the NRL were forced to reach a compromise in the hope of avoiding a drawn-out courtroom battle. Foxtel is also closing in on finalising a deal with the sport that is worth up to $1.6b should they commit until 2027. Fox Sports was due to contribute about $190m this year, increasing by $10m in each of the next two years.

Sources close to the negotiation say Fox will now pay a significantly reduced fee in 2020 and average payments of about $200m a season for up to the next seven years.

Securing the NRL rights until 2027 is a major boost for the pay-TV network, which has slashed more than 300 jobs over two months. Foxtel had 2.93 million subscribers as of March 31, a figure driven by growth of its sports subscription service Kayo. Subscriber numbers for Kayo fell from 444,000 in March to just over 272,000 by May 2.
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/ni...illion-broadcast-bonanza-20200512-p54scv.html

interesting they are looking to go with an extension with fox but not Ch9!
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,609
Let's look at a couple of issues here:
  • The source of the photographs that came out. LM and JAC posted their own photos publicly, whilst the Laidley photographs were a breach of Victoria Police. That's a significant issue that rightly gets coverage.
  • One is criminal case which has significant limits on which journalists can report without effecting the case should it go to trial. The other is a breach of restrictions that is not criminal and is a fine.
  • One is an older white man, and the others a young indigenous men. The fact is this - as much as we like think we've progressed beyond treating people differently based on race, the proof is in the pudding. The media attacks on Latrell have been beyond disgraceful.
  • No article has identified Laidley as the the victim at all. They have definitely taken a more in-depth look at Laidley's fall from grace but I suggest this should be the case when the circumstances are so unusual.
There is no cover up. To suggest this is ridiculous. Rather it is an absolute poor standard of journalism from those who cover Rugby League.

Good post.

Cover-up is strong, agreed. But they definitely ignored the aggressive stalking and poor behavior part of the story.

It's more they incredible sympathy that such behavior has been given in comparison to similar NRL coverage.
 

The Marshall

Juniors
Messages
630
Covid 19 definitely didn’t help but Big League’s days were numbered long before this year. It’s hard to see it coming back
NRL's Big League magazine a victim of 2020
By: Scott Bailey
Time published 2020-05-13 at 11:54 AM (GMT +10:00)
Staff at Big League have been told the magazine won't be produced in 2020, leaving the NRL without an official print program for the first time in a century.


The NRL will be without an official program for the first time in a century with the Big League magazine to be shut down for 2020.

The weekly publication's six full-time staff were told on Wednesday morning that it would not be produced this year, with NRL games to go ahead without crowds.

Officially owned by the NRL and licensed to News Corp, the magazine has been the record for the game since its inception 100 years ago in 1920.

It also produces the official programs for State of Origin and grand finals, as well as the season guide.

The first two rounds for this season and the overall preview had already been printed and sold.

The decision will leave the code without a recognised magazine this year after Rugby League Week was shut down by Bauer Media Group in 2017.

There are still hopes Big League could be revived for 2021.

Under the long-standing deal between News Corp and the NRL, the league pays the media company an annual fee to produce the magazine.

News Corp then pays for staff salaries and production costs.

Staff had been stood down since the competition was stopped in March, with the view to return on its resumption later this month.

The developments comes as the NRL attempts to cut costs across the game by up to $50 million.

Both the NRL and News Corp have been approached by AAP for comment.

http://www.racingandsports.com/news...s-big-league-magazine-a-victim-of-2020/516968
 

no name

Referee
Messages
20,122
The cultural bullshit. Also that JAC had been warned twice previously
How are you going to disprove the cultural ‘bullshit’?
Also, I don’t think he lied about previous warnings. Happy to be proven wrong, just don’t recall him saying he hadn’t been previously warned.
 

Latest posts

Top