Frailty
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,454
I live in Melbourne. Your ad hom is not only wrong but arrogantly wrong.
The first press coverage was Laidley arrested for stalking, then about the leaking of the pictures followed in the next day or so, with the following week all articles (the Age and Herald Sun) about how AFL coaches and players wanted to reach out and check on his mental health, and about how he was "the victim".
The tone and content of these articles is very sympathetic, and full of messages of support and offers of assistance:
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl...-reveals-cultural-change-20200509-p54rf3.html
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/de...g/news-story/ea48bfa3ab4db8ac3761ef7c1fbcc3f7
https://7news.com.au/sport/afl/vict...obe-into-dean-laidley-photo-scandal-c-1023417
https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/me...ley-in-a-bad-place-says-lawyer-ng-b881545485z
Compare this to the coverage given to Latrell Mitchell and Josh Ado-Carr.
Let's look at a couple of issues here:
- The source of the photographs that came out. LM and JAC posted their own photos publicly, whilst the Laidley photographs were a breach of Victoria Police. That's a significant issue that rightly gets coverage.
- One is criminal case which has significant limits on which journalists can report without effecting the case should it go to trial. The other is a breach of restrictions that is not criminal and is a fine.
- One is an older white man, and the others a young indigenous men. The fact is this - as much as we like think we've progressed beyond treating people differently based on race, the proof is in the pudding. The media attacks on Latrell have been beyond disgraceful.
- No article has identified Laidley as the the victim at all. They have definitely taken a more in-depth look at Laidley's fall from grace but I suggest this should be the case when the circumstances are so unusual.