Dallas adds beef ....now the madunit vs rastas thread!

[madunit]

Your mob have only ever had one tough player in your history-John Sattler.

The rest of the team's history is tarnished by their gutless act in 1909. That shouldn't even be declared a premiership-Wests deserved the Premiership that year more than what souths did after that effort. We get you guys back 60 years later and what happens-you cry victim-at least in 69, we turned up like men and beat your arses on the field-How many Finals did Souths beat Balmain in? Just curious. And while your delving around for the answer, tell me how many Finals Balmain beat Souths in. I ain't talking semi's or anything like that-the premiership deciders only!

Go and cry to the mod squad again while your at it.

another dunny victim.

 

[rastus]

Your mob have only ever had one tough player in your history-John Sattler.

The rest of the team's history is tarnished by their gutless act in 1909. That shouldn't even be declared a premiership-Wests deserved the Premiership that year more than what souths did after that effort. We get you guys back 60 years later and what happens-you cry victim-at least in 69, we turned up like men and beat your arses on the field-How many Finals did Souths beat Balmain in? Just curious. And while your delving around for the answer, tell me how many Finals Balmain beat Souths in. I ain't talking semi's or anything like that-the premiership deciders only!

Go and cry to the mod squad again while your at it.

another dunny victim.

So there we have it.

Your entitled to your opinion the same as everyone else, if your still bitter about 1909 that is your problem but don't try and justify the tactics of '69 as they were tatamount to cheating.

As to Souths/Balmain finals, it is not Souths fault that Balmain could not reach more finals - they simply weren't good enough.

Toughness, and you'll have to excuse this :lol: . This coming from a team that had B Elias & G Jack on it's roster (now there are two of the biggest cheap shot merchants you will EVER see)

 

[swoop]

If Souths stop living in the past and concentrate on the future then maybe they will get somewhere!!

 

[madunit]

Your mob have only ever had one tough player in your history-John Sattler.

The rest of the team's history is tarnished by their gutless act in 1909. That shouldn't even be declared a premiership-Wests deserved the Premiership that year more than what souths did after that effort. We get you guys back 60 years later and what happens-you cry victim-at least in 69, we turned up like men and beat your arses on the field-How many Finals did Souths beat Balmain in? Just curious. And while your delving around for the answer, tell me how many Finals Balmain beat Souths in. I ain't talking semi's or anything like that-the premiership deciders only!

Go and cry to the mod squad again while your at it.

another dunny victim.

So there we have it.

Your entitled to your opinion the same as everyone else, if your still bitter about 1909 that is your problem but don't try and justify the tactics of '69 as they were tatamount to cheating.

As to Souths/Balmain finals, it is not Souths fault that Balmain could not reach more finals - they simply weren't good enough.

Toughness, and you'll have to excuse this :lol: . This coming from a team that had B Elias & G Jack on it's roster (now there are two of the biggest cheap shot merchants you will EVER see)

You didn't answer my question idiot. And where in the 69 Grand Final did we cheat. I know that we played by the rules, the referee didn't seem to argue with us.

You've got the sads over Benny being an Australian hooker and Mario somebody never getting a shot. Not that he deserved it either. Garry Jack-must've been good at the cheap shots-I don't recall seeing any-and I'd just like to say-a Golden Boot winner-best player in the world!

 

[rastus]

Your mob have only ever had one tough player in your history-John Sattler.

The rest of the team's history is tarnished by their gutless act in 1909. That shouldn't even be declared a premiership-Wests deserved the Premiership that year more than what souths did after that effort. We get you guys back 60 years later and what happens-you cry victim-at least in 69, we turned up like men and beat your arses on the field-How many Finals did Souths beat Balmain in? Just curious. And while your delving around for the answer, tell me how many Finals Balmain beat Souths in. I ain't talking semi's or anything like that-the premiership deciders only!

Go and cry to the mod squad again while your at it.

another dunny victim.

So there we have it.

Your entitled to your opinion the same as everyone else, if your still bitter about 1909 that is your problem but don't try and justify the tactics of '69 as they were tatamount to cheating.

As to Souths/Balmain finals, it is not Souths fault that Balmain could not reach more finals - they simply weren't good enough.

Toughness, and you'll have to excuse this :lol: . This coming from a team that had B Elias & G Jack on it's roster (now there are two of the biggest cheap shot merchants you will EVER see)

You didn't answer my question idiot. And where in the 69 Grand Final did we cheat. I know that we played by the rules, the referee didn't seem to argue with us.

You've got the sads over Benny being an Australian hooker and Mario somebody never getting a shot. Not that he deserved it either. Garry Jack-must've been good at the cheap shots-I don't recall seeing any-and I'd just like to say-a Golden Boot winner-best player in the world!

:lol: :lol: Ask Ian Roberts about Jack, and after Roberts absolutely wiped the floor with him jimmy cried to the courts :lol: :lol: :lol: . As for "Backdoor" :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[madunit]

You still haven't answered my question.

 

[swoop]

You still haven't answered my question.

Expecting an answer from Rastus are you unit? I thought you'd know better than that! ;-) ;-) :lol:

 

[madunit]

I'm not actually expecting an answer-I just keep posting this just to remind him that he called my stupid. At least I'm intelligent enough to answer questions.

Who's stupid now. C'mon ratsarse, come back and cry about how (God knows how) we robbed ya in 69. Then cry victim....again....start up a thread about me.....cry to the mod squad....again....posts more crap....the list is a continuous cycle

 

[rastus]

You still haven't answered my question.

Expecting an answer from Rastus are you unit? I thought you'd know better than that! ;-) ;-) :lol:

:lol: :lol: Looks like a new "friendship" has been formed :lol: :lol: . I'll leave you guys to it ;-)

 

[swoop]

You still haven't answered my question.

Expecting an answer from Rastus are you unit? I thought you'd know better than that! ;-) ;-) :lol:

:lol: :lol: Looks like a new "friendship" has been formed :lol: :lol: . I'll leave you guys to it ;-)

Run, Rabbit, Run! :lol: :lol: :lol:

BTW Rastus, you found another way to avoid a question! :lol:

 

[rastus]

You still haven't answered my question.

Expecting an answer from Rastus are you unit? I thought you'd know better than that! ;-) ;-) :lol:

:lol: :lol: Looks like a new "friendship" has been formed :lol: :lol: . I'll leave you guys to it ;-)

Run, Rabbit, Run! :lol: :lol: :lol:

BTW Rastus, you found another way to avoid a question! :lol:

:lol: :lol: So what was the question. Now let me see..... how many times have the Tigers beaten Souths in a GF and vice versa. Umm, I don't know and frankly I couldn't care less - if that is the type of statistic that you can so readily recall then all I can say is that (a) It must really mean someting to beat Souths in a GF and, more tellingly, the team you support
has not really achieved much during its tenure (both of which are probably true ).

So there it is, the answer to your elusive question :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[swoop]

Listen Rastus, it's nothing personal.

You came in here the other day and made statements on Rennie after seeing a post made by a person who played with him. When I asked you who that player was you said it was "dirty hoe", (and this isn't a slur on dirty hoe either) but who is dirty hoe. He says he played against Rennie and had his opinion on him.

You then preceded to bag Rennie on one persons' judgement. I don't know how good or bad Rennie is, and neither do you.

But Rastus if you're going to bag a person or a particular club, you have to expect the fans of that club to retaliate. I've done it(retaliate) and most other posters have done it. We can all cop a bit of light banter but there's a fine line. Slugs is a regular who comes in here for a stir!

Rastus anyone, including youself, is welcome to this forum to debate rugby league issues. It's going to be a long offseason so lets play the ball not the man!

 

[madunit]

It's going to be a long offseason so lets play the ball not the man!

but rastus likes playing with men, what do you propose he do now.

Play with himself? You know what they say "Small things amuse small minds." :lol:

 

[rastus]

It's going to be a long offseason so lets play the ball not the man!

but rastus likes playing with men, what do you propose he do now.

Play with himself? You know what they say "Small things amuse small minds." :lol:

:lol: :lol: Whats wrong sadunit, didn't like my answer to your question - but you were so persistant in requesting that I answer it :lol: :lol: . Once again you have proven your stupidity :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: .

From henceforth sadunit shall become stupidunit :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[chileman]

Thankyou for keeping it reasonably clean in here....I have aptly renamed this thread :lol: ...my money is on madunit to win (by the way, as I've said before, this is a Manly section...this thread you are welcome to have your debate whether it is Manly, Souths, Wests or the Tigers...but please keep it just in this thread if it has nothing to do with Manly! thanks

 

[rastus]

Thankyou for keeping it reasonably clean in here....I have aptly renamed this thread :lol: ...my money is on madunit to win (by the way, as I've said before, this is a Manly section...this thread you are welcome to have your debate whether it is Manly, Souths, Wests or the Tigers...but please keep it just in this thread if it has nothing to do with Manly! thanks

No problem . Glad to hear your money is on stupidunit - it's obvious that my little digs at Manly have had their desired effect ;-)

 

[madunit]

no ratfuzz, your digs at Manly have proven just how docile you are, that's why I'm favourite. Your answer to my question was more pitiful than a foetus' drawing.

You just keep leaving yourself open don't ya, it's bound to happen thopugh when you constantly bent over!

It wouldn't be a typical 'conversation' with ratfuzz if emoticons weren't used, so here goes. :lol: 8) :? :shock: :x ;-) ;-) :roll: :twisted: :evil: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: =D> #-o ](*,) :-k [-( 8-[ [-o< [-X :^o =P~ O =; :-& :-({|= :-$ :-s \\/ :doubt: :badgrin: :-#

That should just about do it. C'mon ratfuzz say something stupid again-I like cabaret!

 

[rastus]

no ratfuzz, your digs at Manly have proven just how docile you are, that's why I'm favourite. Your answer to my question was more pitiful than a foetus' drawing.

You just keep leaving yourself open don't ya, it's bound to happen thopugh when you constantly bent over taking it up the backdoor. Having trouble sitting down lately are ya!

It wouldn't be a typical 'conversation' with ratfuzz if emoticons weren't used, so here goes. :lol: 8) :? :shock: :x ;-) ;-) :roll: :twisted: :evil: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: =D> #-o ](*,) :-k [-( 8-[ [-o&lt, post: [-X :^o =P~ O =, member: :-& :-({|= :-$ :-s \\/ :doubt: :badgrin: :-#

That should just about do it. C'mon ratfuzz say something stupid again-I like cabaret![/quote"]

:lol: Aren't you going to answer my question stupidunit . Are you the sort of feeble-minded person that is obsessed with meaninless statistics because there is nothing of substance in your live other than that. Poor poor stupiunit what a sad sad live you must have :lol: :lol:

By the way stupidunit, I'm sure your drawings aren't that bad :lol: :lol:

 

[madunit]

you don't have the mental aptitude to ask a question ratsarse. You'd be out of your depth in a car park puddle.

At least I can draw pictures, seeing as how I've got hands and all! It's a bit of a bugger you don't have any hands, seeing as how you were the product of your sister and brother. Inbreeding generally has it's side effects and ratfuzz-you are the side effect-time for an emoticon :lol:

 

[Slugs]

Thankyou for keeping it reasonably clean in here....I have aptly renamed this thread :lol: ...my money is on madunit to win (by the way, as I've said before, this is a Manly section...this thread you are welcome to have your debate whether it is Manly, Souths, Wests or the Tigers...but please keep it just in this thread if it has nothing to do with Manly! thanks

Chile (Out) Man

Sooner than later you will start locking threads that Mad Unit is involved in. See he is like a pit bull terrior ...he latches on and won't let go.....he is like a fart that continues to linger and follow you no matter how hard you try to get away from it. He is like a broken record going over and over and over and over again

He has turned the Souths Forum into a mockery (10 locked threads at last count) and now no one posts there because they have to encounter 1/3 of the three stooges ...namely Mad Unit.These guys are all supporters of the Merged Scum yet for some unknown reason they raraely post in their own Forum and would rather infect other supporters Forums. Truth is they probably have been banned from their own Forum

MadUnit has now spread his wings and sets his sights on your Forum.....good luck with him ...you will need it :lol: :lol: :lol:

BTW he has this weird infactuation with cheeseburgers ,Owen Craigie and McDonalds.....I notice he now even has a picture of his hero Ronald McDonald eating shit as his avatar.......enough said :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: