mickdo
Coach
- Messages
- 17,355
Yeah, Idris just played a full season and did nothing :roll:
My point is, Mortimer came in late, wouldn't have polled enough.
Actually, Mortimer picked up 7 Dally M points and Idris only 1...
Yeah, Idris just played a full season and did nothing :roll:
My point is, Mortimer came in late, wouldn't have polled enough.
Out of curiosity, who do people think should have won lock of the year? Other than Stagg?
I never understand this argument.It's alot harder to score points if you're in a good team than a poor team, and that doesn't truly reflect the performance throughout a season.
Haha, geniused like the constant look on Anthony Watmoughs face?
I personally think all of the awards are a farce, but at the end of the day, probably the two best players in the comp this season got the big prizes.
It's alot harder to score points if you're in a good team than a poor team, and that doesn't truly reflect the performance throughout a season.
[FKN-SIK];6093270 said:NSW = 0/2 with Farah
NSW = 1/1 with Ennis
There's a start lol
On the contrary, if you're in a team that is say a fringe top 8 side, with mostly mediocre players, but 2 or 3 good ones its alot easier to poll high points compared to a side that is strong across the park and having 10 guys competing for points.if you're in a poor team it's hard to score points because you're likely to get smashed every week. I don't know how people can't see this.
I think Idris deserved it tbh... he played most of the season. IIRC Dugan and Morts weren't really around until the latter half of the season.
No I agree, but it often sees some guys in lower sides scrape in whilst guys in higher placed sides have still probably performed better yet don't get anywhere near the top 10.Hasn't stopped top placed players winning the Dally M before.
On the contrary, if you're in a team that is say a fringe top 8 side, with mostly mediocre players, but 2 or 3 good ones its alot easier to poll high points compared to a side that is strong across the park and having 10 guys competing for points.
The winning tally tonight was 30 points, which means 10 games you need to poll 3 points, thats disregarding points gained in losses. Even the pretty poor sides in this comp won 10 games. In fact only 4 didn't and the Raiders won 9. If you've got one player performing in those sides it's always pretty easy for them to poll well whenever they win. Whereas you get a team on top of the comp, clearly many more players of their's are performing.
no it will show the bulldogs choked when the they had the minor premiership but lost it and if they dont win another game this year another chokeup the dogs, good to see the st merge fans so bitter haha