Daniel Anderson eyes court action against Parramatta Eels over a payout dispute

[lingard]

You may think that Bart but my motives are not political at all.
Personally, I think it's unwise to be making personal judgements and casting aspertions about people regarding a situation we know nothing about. And that goes for both parties in this situation.

Suity

That`s exactly where I`m coming from too. Hell, I don`t even know who`s on the board. I don`t even know what a board does. I don`t even care. I just hate people trying to influence others with utter, unsubstantiated bullsh*t. And then there`s the mindless idiots who follow like sheep and just believe whoever talks the loudest. Wake up, guys.

 

[Casper The Ghost]

And you know this for a fact do you?

It is my understanding that Daniel Anderson has dreamed of nothing more than coaching his beloved Eels. It is the job he has always coverted. To finally prove himself worthy & then to have snatched away from him by being told the people currently running this club would rather have a nuffy "with potential" than an accomplished coach such as himself is just cruel.

WOE

:thumb

 

[Maroubra Eel]

Well, with all due respects, M.E - how on earth would you know?

Just from the things I hear and read.

 

[Casper The Ghost]

Just from the things I hear and read.

Where there's smoke there's fire.
Shoddy work reveals shoddy labourers.
A woman bashed reveals the effects and attitudes of the basher.
A man who marries a beautiful, vivacious woman and then treats her badly.
Through his abuse, she will become a faded, frightened, dowdy woman in the image of that abuse.
If she escapes the marriage and creates a dream of a man who genuinely loves her, she will blossom again into
a beautiful, happy woman in the image of the relationship she is now co-creating.

Think about 3P's roll (political censorship) in all of this!!!!!

 

[Maroubra Eel]

Too right Casper.

 

[born an eel]

That`s exactly where I`m coming from too. Hell, I don`t even know who`s on the board. I don`t even know what a board does. I don`t even care. I just hate people trying to influence others with utter, unsubstantiated bullsh*t. And then there`s the mindless idiots who follow like sheep and just believe whoever talks the loudest. Wake up, guys.

and yet you feel people should take notice of your opinion, there is plenty of information out in the public domain on the performance of the board, you just have to care enough to take notice of it.

The sooner you wake up and understand the board can influence the on field performances of the team, the sooner you will take more notice of what is going on around you and want to be involved.

 

[mickdo]

The sooner you wake up and understand the board can influence the on field performances of the team

I don't remember too many Fitzy supporters saying that after we came from 14th to make the GF last year :lol:

 

[born an eel]

I don't remember too many Fitzy supporters saying that after we came from 14th to make the GF last year :lol:

but I thought you believed it was all the coaches doing............or is that only when things go bad...:crazy:

 

[Casper The Ghost]

and yet you feel people should take notice of your opinion, there is plenty of information out in the public domain on the performance of the board, you just have to care enough to take notice of it.

The sooner you wake up and understand the board can influence the on field performances of the team, the sooner you will take more notice of what is going on around you and want to be involved.

:thumb:thumb:thumb

 

[mickdo]

but I thought you believed it was all the coaches doing............or is that only when things go bad...:crazy:

When did I ever say that???

 

[born an eel]

When did I ever say that???

ok I jumped to a bit of a wrong conclusion, but you seem to be giving the board your full support and readily attack any criticism as being support for DF.

Back in 2009 there were plenty suggesting the wave of success was entirely up to the new board and change in management but those same people are blaming 2010 on DA.

 

[The EELiminator]

That`s exactly where I`m coming from too. Hell, I don`t even know who`s on the board. I don`t even know what a board does. I don`t even care. I just hate people trying to influence others with utter, unsubstantiated bullsh*t. And then there`s the mindless idiots who follow like sheep and just believe whoever talks the loudest. Wake up, guys.

if you are looking for intelligent debate you are in the wrong forum mate

 

[Poupou Escobar]

there is plenty of information out in the public domain

There's your problem.

All the truth in the world might be in the public domain, but it's too well hidden amongst the bullsh*t.

 

[cgee221]

Articles like this are like lawyers asking leading questions.

Journalists have an angle or an agenda and with articles like this a lot of you buy into the style of writing that's employed and start developing your own lines of thought to how situations went down.

Fact of the matter is this:

Unless any of you were involved with any of these preceedings and know the full details of this scenario, than feel free to cast your opinion. However even if you did know, why would you share it in a public domain such as the internet?

It is a legal matter between the former employee and employer. It therefore should remain private.

Sure there is the arguement that as stakeholders of the club we should know what's going on and I agree that we should, but not until the matter is resolved.

We don't know the details and we shouldn't be casting judgement of any kind. There is no doubting the dismissal of Anderson was handled very poorly and publicly, however every situation involving our club should be judged on its merits rather than as one big witch hunt and conspiracy theory.

Some of you are grown men and women, stop being so childish and carrying on. If any of your children behaved in the manner some of you do on this forum, you'd punish them. There are more effective ways of communicating your views.

 

[Casper The Ghost]

if you are looking for intelligent debate you are in the wrong forum mate

To those who place angel wings and halo's around 3P & co , used as sedatives and prescripted medication to keep them at a distance from taking responsibility and doing something before it is too late....

The boy cried wolf!!!
The boy cried wolf!!!
The boy cried wolf!!!

The final time the boy cried wolf (3P are angels)..... but then it was too late.

 

[Suitman]

Articles like this are like lawyers asking leading questions.

Journalists have an angle or an agenda and with articles like this a lot of you buy into the style of writing that's employed and start developing your own lines of thought to how situations went down.

Fact of the matter is this:

Unless any of you were involved with any of these preceedings and know the full details of this scenario, than feel free to cast your opinion.

Amazing how much a bit of common sense makes so much difference. Not sure how many of the protaginists could actually argue with this line. No doubt, the conspiracy's will come flying this way though.

We don't know the details and we shouldn't be casting judgement of any kind. There is no doubting the dismissal of Anderson was handled very poorly and publicly,

Very few people have argued against that opinion. In fact, I'd suggest that a huge majority agree with it, judging by replies on this forum.

however every situation involving our club should be judged on its merits rather than as one big witch hunt and conspiracy theory.

Some of you are grown men and women, stop being so childish and carrying on. If any of your children behaved in the manner some of you do on this forum, you'd punish them. There are more effective ways of communicating your views.

Be prepared for a hammering mate. There ain't no childish people on this forum. :sarcasm:

Great post cgee221.

Suity

 

[mickdo]

ok I jumped to a bit of a wrong conclusion, but you seem to be giving the board your full support and readily attack any criticism as being support for DF.

Support for now, yes. They've clearly done some things that they could have done better, but as Eels boards go that's nothing new. It's early days really and I'm in no hurry to turf them out just because certain elements are making noise (as expected).

Back in 2009 there were plenty suggesting the wave of success was entirely up to the new board and change in management but those same people are blaming 2010 on DA.

Entirely because of the new board? I think you'd be very hard pressed to find anyone who said that. There's no question they were a factor though, but the players and coach had the biggest hand in it (as they always do).

2010 is much the same... lots of factors, with DA certainly being one of them. The board can take their share of blame, but they had a fair bit of credit in the bank from last year I think.

 

[Maroubra Eel]

Good post cgee221.

If my kids behaved like this current board I would spank them and send them to their rooms.

 

[born an eel]

Sure there is the arguement that as stakeholders of the club we should know what's going on and I agree that we should, but not until the matter is resolved. .

unfortunatley there is speculation that the board are holding back until after the election, giving an indication that what they are trying to do will not be popular. It would not surprise me for this to be true but I do not know.

There is form from the board in regards to the issue of DF life membership and the fact that they like to mention DF taking them to court but apart from sevens mentioning it on here I have not heard anything from the club about this whole issue.

 

[born an eel]

Support for now, yes. They've clearly done some things that they could have done better, but as Eels boards go that's nothing new. It's early days really and I'm in no hurry to turf them out just because certain elements are making noise (as expected).



Entirely because of the new board? I think you'd be very hard pressed to find anyone who said that. There's no question they were a factor though, but the players and coach had the biggest hand in it (as they always do).

2010 is much the same... lots of factors, with DA certainly being one of them. The board can take their share of blame, but they had a fair bit of credit in the bank from last year I think.

how did they have more credit than DA?