You can see in this press conference they want to throttle him.
He keeps asking them to express an opinion which they legally cannot do.
And yet he's still asking...
First off, LOL at Weidler accusing anyone of bring smug.The Sharks' early-evening news conference on Friday was an exercise in spin and self-protection, and nothing more. It was held at a time designed to make it difficult for television news bulletins and newspaper deadlines - it was a classic Friday evening bad news release in the hope of minimising the impact. The news conference failed on every level. You had to feel sorry for Sharks deputy chairman Keith Ward - he was clearly out of his depth facing an angry media pack who had been given no answers for more than three weeks. However, it was the smug performance from from former deputy chairwoman of the Australian Sports Drug Agency Dr Tricia Kavanagh that did the Sharks the biggest disservice. The contempt she showed and the belittling nature of her answers should ensure that she is never put up to represent the Sharks again. She appeared to have no idea of the hurt the Cronulla club and its fans are going through and, more to the point, the way those who were sacked and stood down would feel. The whole reason the news conference was held was to protect the board members. The reason given for the standings-down was ''management deficiencies''. The reason that was offered as an explanation was to hopefully prevent Sharks players from suing the club. If the board could say they knew nothing of what was going on because of bumbling management, they could not be viewed as liable for the players being given substances ASADA is determined to prove are illegal. For the entire week, Sharks media manager Rob Willis was forced to fend off every journalist in town and beyond. Willis did a great job in difficult circumstances and if the Sharks want to get out of this mess, he should be given a greater role in ongoing communications.
for a second i misread the title. i thought it said danny weidler bashed
First off, LOL at Weidler accusing anyone of bring smug.
On Kavanagh, she was great, put all the hacks in their place.
Kudos.
She wasn't smug, I thought she looked bewildered when she was responding to his questions.
As in why is this little ant asking me such stupid questions that he knows can't be answered.
Hope he gets a warm welcome out at Shark park tonight
Poor Danny, no pound if flesh huh??
First off, LOL at Weidler accusing anyone of bring smug.
On Kavanagh, she was great, put all the hacks in their place.
Kudos.
I'm not saying it's right or wrong what the club has done, just that she handled Weidler, Rothfield etc well.Are you lot f**king serious?
Are you for ... f**king ... real?
She was absolutely smug, she was answering questions that a consultant has no right to be answering, and she does not have the best interests of the club at heart.
She was demanding that the sacking of Givney not be called a sacking for Gods sake. A consultant! What nerve!
Unless Flanagan himself had personally been jabbing great vials of anabolics into the backside of Paul Gallen, you do not immediately gut your football staff, ruin your season and voluntarily place your club into a severe crisis.
You wait the season out and wait for evidence to be brought to trial.
Then you bargain.
Anyone who supports what Kavanagh has recommended is a cretin and a stain on Rugby Leagues backside.
Read Phil Goulds latest column where he says to ASADA put up or shut up - that is the appropriate response. Not destroying your own club on the recommendation of some puissant consultant.
Bugger this bullshit.
and people should start asking Richard Ings for his opinion
he's a f**kwit