Darren Lockyer 4chan/sp

[El Diablo]

just never read any pm he might send

no doubt they'd be dodgy

 

[RABK]

I never said I was a regular visitor. You can't make accusations like that. You're the one defending the site, not me

Razor logic 101

In slamming the morals and character of razor for admitting to been a visitor to child porn haven 4 chan, rabk is defending 4 chan.

 

[Razor]

Razor logic 101

In slamming the morals and character of razor for admitting to been a visitor to child porn haven 4 chan, rabk is defending 4 chan.

If you read I said I don't visit it and the people that do are perverted scum. That's when you slammed my character - after I called cp lovers scum. So it's not a stretch to say that you defend cp sites. And in doing so accusing me of viewing such material, which is why this site will be hearing from my lawyer next week.

 

[Butters]

Ahh /sp/... I remember when it had no mods and my face when wasn't an autoban. Memories....

 

[RABK]

I never said I was a regular visitor. Everyone knows what that site is like. I deleted it because as I said you can't read, and have no idea what I said meant. You can't make accusations like that. You're the one defending the site, not me. Mr Diablo made similar accusations.

The thread starter, Charles Bronson, obviously visits the site. You're not attacking him are you? You're only attacking the people that are calling the site visitors scum. Tells me you love the site.

I don't know the structure of 4 chan but i'd imagine it's a forum like LU broken into sections. Charles mentioned something about lockyer so perhaps he visits the sports section. You mention kiddy porn and visiting it to check if anythings changed. (check if content was updated etc) Perhaps you visit the sewers of 4chan whilst charles was unaware of it's existence. Ihad heard of 4chan a few times before but never heard of it harboring child porn before until you.

 

[RABK]

If you read I said I don't visit it and the people that do are perverted scum. That's when you slammed my character - after I called cp lovers scum. So it's not a stretch to say that you defend cp sites. And in doing so accusing me of viewing such material, which is why this site will be hearing from my attorney next week.

:lol: You do realise your unedited post was quoted? The one where you admitted to visiting.

 

[El Diablo]

If you read I said I don't visit it and the people that do are perverted scum. That's when you slammed my character - after I called cp lovers scum. So it's not a stretch to say that you defend cp sites. And in doing so accusing me of viewing such material, which is why this site will be hearing from my lawyer next week.

:lol:

f**king idiot

 

[Razor]

Ihad heard of 4chan a few times before but never heard of it harboring child porn before until you.

Considering 5 people in this thread mentioned the cp before I did is another example of you not being able to read.

 

[RABK]

Considering 5 people in this thread mentioned the cp before I did is another example of you not being able to read.

I opened the thread through the last post button, which was yours.

 

[RABK]

And those people warned of the cp, they could be relaying info they heard. You admitted to visiting it.

 

[Razor]

:lol: You do realise your unedited post was quoted? The one where you admitted to visiting.

No I never said I visit it. I said nI very now and then I go and have a quick check (ie. once a year or so) - a quick check back DOES NOT mean visit.

I'll explain it for the stupids.

It means going to the site with images turned off for 2-3 seconds and looking at the thread topics.

And as further evidence of your enormous stupidity, 4chan is constantly in the news - the piece of scum that posted cp on the tribute sites was part of the 4chan organised troll. So many hacks and dos attacks are organised by 4chan. The crazy psycho that threw a live cat into her garbage bin was a 4chan person. They are gutter trash. And you're defending someone that is very much opposed to the site. You should be ashamed of yourself.

So thankyou for admitting you never read or watch the news. It is now more udnerstandable why you can't read.

 

[Razor]

No I never said I visit it. I said nI very now and then I go and have a quick check (ie. once a year or so) - a quick check back DOES NOT mean visit.
[/qjuote]

For some reason can't edit posts -

should be 'everd now and tn"

 

[Razor]

No I never said I visit it. I said nI very now and then I go and have a quick check (ie. once a year or so) - a quick check back DOES NOT mean visit.
[/qjuote]

For some reason can't edit posts -

should be 'everd now and tn"

Sorry 'every now and then;

 

[Apey]

1 2 3

No I said I edited it because some people can't read - and you just proved it again.

Sorry, but what's difficult to read here:

Every now and then I go and have a quick check to see if it's changed. It never does.

and then...

Fact is people that regulary visit a site loaded with CP won't want to be admitting to it publically.

beautiful. *tear*

which is why this site will be hearing from my lawyer next week.

:lol:

I opened the thread through the last post button, which was yours.

you poor soul.

 

[Razor]

1 2 3



Sorry, but what's difficult to read here:

It tells me you're a moron

 

[simmo1]

Pretty sad when people who visit CP websites (like Razor), also have kids.

 

[Willow]

The fact that Danish and El Diablo - the 2 LU owners continue to allow LU to link to the site tells you a lot about them.

I wish.

 

[Apey]

It tells me you're a moron

Is it just a coincidence that the reason you don't visit much (any more) is because the CP has dried up?

If so that is absolutely disgusting & immoral.

 

[Razor]

Is it just a coincidence that the reason you don't visit much (any more) is because the CP has dried up?

If so that is absolutely disgusting & immoral.

Last time I visited in mid 2009 based on the writing in the threads it was in 75% of threads on the first page.

And despite the forum rules having rules with a "Excessively sexually-oriented" rule, and this forum continues to link to the site says a lot about how the moderators/admins and owners actually pay attention to their rules they set and that they're only there for show for any legal situations that arise.

 

[Didgi]

And you're defending someone that is very much opposed to the site. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Defending somone that is opposed to a site that has a history of CP? That sounds noble, why would you think they should be ashamed of themselves? Are you pro-CP by any chance?

Also, love how its gone from 'every now and then' to 'a few months/a year' to 'in 2009' when he last visited. can't settle on a date Razor?