What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

David Gallop offers Brett Stewart a chance

gong_eagle

First Grade
Messages
7,655
David Gallop offers Brett Stewart a chance



Article from: The Australian
ON the verge of his return to the NRL, Manly fullback Brett Stewart has again been offered an olive branch by league boss David Gallop in an attempt to resolve their differences.
The latest offer to meet at NRL headquarters to clear the air was made yesterday, with Stewart scheduled to appear in Manly Local Court today to answer a charge of sexual assault against a teenage girl.
The former Test fullback has not played a game this season, after the NRL stood him down for breaching its code of conduct guidelines regarding alcohol consumption in public places.
With Gallop having said he won't stand in the way of his return once the ban was over, Stewart will be named in the team today to face Wests Tigers at Brookvale Oval on Sunday.
His return could not come at a better time for the premier, which remains winless after four rounds this season.
Gallop was disappointed at Stewart's behaviour which came a week before the start of the season, with the league forced to dump him as the face of its $1.5million advertising campaign.
The league boss has already attempted to make peace with Stewart and his family but it is understood they are disappointed at the way the matter was handled, believing he was made a scapegoat.
"At this stage we expect him to be playing on the weekend," Gallop said.
"I did offer a few weeks ago to meet him if he wished to hear a first-hand explanation of how we viewed things.
"He hasn't taken that up and that is really his call."
Manly chief executive Grant Mayer said he was aware of Gallop's offer to ease any simmering tension.
"It's all about timing and obviously the family don't believe the timing is right just yet," Mayer said.
Stewart's four-week ban has set the tone for other players' bad behaviour this season.
Sydney Roosters' Jake Friend, Willie Mason and Nate Myles, Cronulla's Brett Seymour, and the Bulldogs' Jamal Idris, Ben Barba and Lee Te Maari have been banned by their clubs or the league for alcohol-related incidents.
Stewart's case is only down for mention today and his legal team is expected to make orders requiring police to serve a brief of evidence. The legal proceedings are only expected to last a matter of minutes.
Beleaguered Sea Eagles players said yesterday Stewart's return could have a positive impact on the team.
"Everyone has been backing up for the last month or so and we're really keen to have him back. It's certainly going to give a bit of a buzz to the team to have him back out there," prop Jason King said.
Fellow front-rower Josh Perry said he was also looking forward to the return of last year's leading tryscorer.
"He's been looked after really well by the club that way and I've got no doubt that he'll come out and perform well," Perry said.
Stewart isn't the only former international edging towards a return to the field.
After initially being refused a visa to play with Super League club Hull, Michael Crocker had some good news this week when the British Sports Minister said he would intervene on behalf of the former Melbourne, Queensland and Australia forward.
Although no explanation was given, it is believed Crocker's initial application was rejected because of a previous conviction for affray.
The British Government's clamp-down on visas also resulted in former Cronulla forward Greg Bird being denied an opportunity to play for Bradford. Bird is now with French club Catalans.
While Bird was forced to look elsewhere, Crocker has refused to countenance anything other than playing for Hull despite interest from several NRL clubs.
His determination looks likely to be rewarded thanks to British Sports Minister Gerry Sutcliffe.
"I am happy for the club if they want to get in touch with me to do so and I will speak to the relevant minister," Sutcliffe told the Hull Daily Mail.
 
Messages
21,880
if i were stewart i'd tell him to go f*ck himself.

suspending a player for 4 weeks without giving him the chance to defend himself is outrageous.

no amount of explaining is going to make it right either.
 

AILD

Bench
Messages
3,602
he suspended him for being drunk and ejected from the launch. for that he was guilty.
 

Dutchy

Immortal
Messages
33,887
he suspended him for being drunk and ejected from the launch. for that he was guilty.

Lockyer was drunk and crash tackled a pub manager. For that he was guilty, where was his 4 weeks?
 

squiddy

Juniors
Messages
1,171
if i were stewart i'd tell him to go f*ck himself.

suspending a player for 4 weeks without giving him the chance to defend himself is outrageous.

no amount of explaining is going to make it right either.

Mate do you know why he was suspended ??

If I was the CEO and just spent 100K plus launching the seasona nd have your marquee player get pi**ed and act a fool - I'd suspend him for good. Stewart should consider himself lucky to be back this week . never mind the charges which were announced today
 
Messages
21,880
Mate do you know why he was suspended ??

If I was the CEO and just spent 100K plus launching the seasona nd have your marquee player get pi**ed and act a fool - I'd suspend him for good. Stewart should consider himself lucky to be back this week . never mind the charges which were announced today

yes , he was suspended for being drunk , nothing more , nothing less.

He should have had the right to tell he side of the story. How the hell do we know how he behaved unless some sort of hearing is held?
 

Didgi

Moderator
Messages
17,260
yes , he was suspended for being drunk , nothing more , nothing less.

He should have had the right to tell he side of the story. How the hell do we know how he behaved unless some sort of hearing is held?

He was suspended for being drunk at the season launch, and being so drunk he was received service and kicked out of several nightclubs.
 

God-King Dean

Immortal
Messages
46,614
Offically it's for being wasted at a launch. But I guarentee if it were some nuffy *cough* Bryce Gibbs *cough*, they be no 4 week suspension.
 

Ziggy the God

First Grade
Messages
5,240
Why is Gallop offering an olive branch?

Stewart should be apologising to all of the fans for dragging the game through the mud in the week leading up to the season because he can't control how much piss he drinks.

Hilarious.
 

typicalfan

Coach
Messages
15,488
Perhaps its a way to move on a little from the suspension and the issue. Surely this is a positive news story and i think its a good idea.
 

Charlie124

First Grade
Messages
8,509
yes , he was suspended for being drunk , nothing more , nothing less.

He should have had the right to tell he side of the story. How the hell do we know how he behaved unless some sort of hearing is held?

You actually said it all yourself here, "he was suspended for being drunk, nothing more, nothing less". So what would "his side of the story" matter? he cant defend the proven fact that he was sh*tfaced to the point of being refused alcohol at a season launch. Thats all there is to it and thats what he was suspended for.
 
Messages
3,070
He was suspended for being drunk at the season launch, and being so drunk he was received service and kicked out of several nightclubs.

No. How many times could you be wong in one stupid sentence.

He was suspended for allegedly being drunk.

It wasnt THE season launch (as in the NRL).

You know nothing about how so drunk or so sober he was on that day ?

He received service because he was so drunk eh ? LOL

Prove he was kicked out of exactly which nightclubs.

FMD.
 
Messages
3,070
You actually said it all yourself here, "he was suspended for being drunk, nothing more, nothing less". So what would "his side of the story" matter? he cant defend the proven fact that he was sh*tfaced to the point of being refused alcohol at a season launch. Thats all there is to it and thats what he was suspended for.

Proven fact eh. Why dont you enlighten all of us.

Hope your appearing as witness so it can all be cleared up. Of course if not maybe your full of piss and wind.
 

typicalfan

Coach
Messages
15,488
He was suspended for allegedly being drunk.

.

A quote "Gallop justified Stewart's suspension on the basis of his drunken behaviour at Manly's March 6 season launch" This is straight out of a News Ltd article back in March

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/nrl/story/0,27074,25216263-14823,00.html

He wasn't allegedly drunk, he WAS drunk. And it wasn't him being drunk, it was the behaviour exhibited while drunk which led to his 4 week suspension.

I guess perhaps you don't have as much of a handle on what happened as you appear you do.
 

Charlie124

First Grade
Messages
8,509
Proven fact eh. Why dont you enlighten all of us.

Hope your appearing as witness so it can all be cleared up. Of course if not maybe your full of piss and wind.

Glad to help

http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2008/s2513554.htm

Why would i appear as a witness? what is there to be cleared up? he's just served his suspension you dipsh*t, he's not going to court about him being refused alcohol.

btw. Manly Wharf Hotel is the name of the place he was asked to leave after being refused alcohol, because he was too sh*tface.
 
Messages
3,070
A quote "Gallop justified Stewart's suspension on the basis of his drunken behaviour at Manly's March 6 season launch" This is straight out of a News Ltd article back in March

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/nrl/story/0,27074,25216263-14823,00.html

He wasn't allegedly drunk, he WAS drunk. And it wasn't him being drunk, it was the behaviour exhibited while drunk which led to his 4 week suspension.

I guess perhaps you don't have as much of a handle on what happened as you appear you do.

LOL @ the bolded bit.

On what basis do you propose that an article in the paper is fact ?

By all means super intelligent one. Astonish us all.

BTW, I appear to have a handle on things very well in comparison. Thanks for the control test. :lol:
 

Latest posts

Top