2010Dragons
Bench
- Messages
- 4,025
well im rejoicing we are winning but we are doing it on the back of defence, defence and more defence. we havent got any long range scorers or any flare, except the one with farrel and he should of executed it better. we are scoring 10 to 15 per match. do you guys think this is good enough for the road ahead? i remember in 2010 where we were in a similiar mood and bennett said that he wanted a defence team as he thought we couldn't attack and we had his love child playing for us.
in addition we had a similiar winning sequence in 2010 and then we got absolutely smashed. granted we found our mojo and creamed a few teams from that point on but we never smashed teams. we won the competition that year but we were labelled with most boring team in the comp at differant stages.
in 2011 everything went down hill until present. ARE WE FOLLOWING THE SAME FORMULA. and remember everybody was baying for marys early expulsion up until the third or fourth game.
Dino
I don?t care if we win by 1 point or 100 points, as long as we win.
I don?t care if we are labelled boring, this is not a popularity contest, and the media and other jealous fans can say whatever they want to fool people like you? as long as we win and keep on winning.
We had ?flare? when we have Choco, Tinga, Barrett and co plus half the SOO/AUS side, what did we win ?.... zip, zero, nada, zilch, duck egg ?nothing !!
Footy has changed; it is about strong defence and grinding the win out. We don?t need to smash teams every week.
You are only paraphrasing what you hear from the media tripe?.
Watch other top teams, analysis how other winning teams are playing the game, you will then notice that, they are a carbon copy of the mighty Red V.
If it is working, why fix/break it?