jimmythehand
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,071
The evidence was in the footage, I think it was a no try.
When you THINK YOU MIGHT HAVE seen something, it's called circumstantial evidence. It doesn't hold up.
The evidence was in the footage, I think it was a no try.
Whilst you are entitled to "YOUR OPINION", I'm afraid that 'I think' will not hold up in a court of law.
We're talking past actions here, not standard opinion ;-)Next time you have an opinion I'll be sure to quote you on that.
I'll be very happy to rule Luke Patten's was no try if I see conclusive evidence of it. Otherwise Benefit of the doubt.I believe Pattens was a no try but those are the calls , we had plenty go against us so im happy to take it
Yes, a bunch of redneck fans in an audience for Channel 9 is a good "public poll" :lol:
I believe Pattens was a no try but those are the calls , we had plenty go against us so im happy to take it
Not quite. Ursula Mayes is her name. Juiced 2 Cover Girl! I hope she doesn't end up getting whored out like Krystal did :x
![]()
We've had the most crucial calls go against us out of every other team this season.That is my point you guys have had good and bad calls go both for and against you, just like pretty much every team in the comp!
just as long as things even themselves out and we get all the crucial calls in the finals![]()
We've had the most crucial calls go against us out of every other team this season.
We've definitely had the worst end of the stick from the referees and video referees.. I wouldn't be saying that if we weren't denied 2 points, though.
But that happens. We've had the great mentality to just get on with things and fight back to remain in the hunt for the minor premiership despite having 4 points stolen from us wrongfully.
It just goes to show how great of a club we are and how good of a team we have this year.
Care to explain this one to me? Regardless of players on the field, there was no issue with the scoring of the try...the panthers game the dogs won on a try which wasnt a try